Clinical trial · Interventional
PEEK Versus Metallic Attachment-retained Obturators
PEEK Versus Metallic Attachment-retained Obturators Regarding Patient Satisfaction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT04778254CI-TRIAL-00050438PEEKcompletedN/AClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Patients' satisfaction evaluation and radiographic evaluation of the terminal abutments of attachment- retained maxillary obturators with metal framework versus milled PEEK framework in the management of maxillectomy cases.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maxillary Neoplasms | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (3)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| conventional obturator | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
| metalic attachment retained obturator | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
| PEEK attachment retained obturator | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (3)
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- conventional obturator
- description
- conventional group received conventional clasp-retained obturators with metallic framework (Control group).
- interventionNames
- Other: conventional obturator
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- metallic attachment retained obturator
- description
- metal group received an attachment-retained obturator with metallic framework
- interventionNames
- Other: metalic attachment retained obturator
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- PEEk attachment retained obturator
- description
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * patient underwent surgical removal of half of maxilla * participants with a sufficient number of natural teeth(class I and \\or class IV Aramany classification) not less than 5 teeth, mouth opening is not less than 25 mm, intact soft palate, Exclusion Criteria: * participants are exposed to radiotherapy or chemotherapy during last year. * participant with congenital defect
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available
No reference posted for this study.