Clinical trial · Interventional
Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
A Multicentric, Open-labeled, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the Satisfaction and Safety of the Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction in Patients Receiving Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Implant Combined With TiLoop® Bra After Skin Sparing or Nipple-areola Sparing Mastectomy
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Breast cancer is one of the main malignant tumors threatening women's lives. In recent years, the increasing demand for reconstruction of breast cancer patients in China has made the proportion of breast reconstruction increase year by year, while implant reconstruction has become the most important way of breast reconstruction due to its less injury, shorter time of operation and relatively simple surgical technique. In the long-term clinical practice, due to the lack of safe and effective alternative methods, the reconstruction method with prosthesis placed to posterior pectoralis major has been accepted by surgeons and patients, and has become the most commonly used method of prosthesis construction. However, the development of biomaterials provides new ideas for breast reconstruction. At present, more and more doctors in clinical practice discontinue the use of serratus anterior, but use the synthetic mesh (mostly titanium mesh TiLoop® Bra) or allogeneic acellular dermal matrix mesh to cover part of the dilator or prosthesis so as to shorten the entire operation cycle and make the appearance of the reconstructed breast more natural and aesthetic. In particular, it can improve the contour of the folds under the breast and shape the breasts with a certain degree of sagging. This study takes the patients receiving immediate reconstruction with an implant combined with TiLoop® Bra after total mastectomy as the subjects, aiming to compare the aesthetics and safety of the placement of implant to anterior and posterior pectoralis major through a prospective and randomized study. The primary objective of the study is to analyze the aesthetics of breast appearance, patient satisfaction and postoperative quality of life (QOL) of the placement of implant to anterior and posterior pectoralis major. The secondary objective of the study is to analyze the incidence of complications and type of reoperation in both groups.
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breast Carcinoma | Breast Carcinoma | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
| Breast Reconstruction | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| prepectoral implant-based reconstruction | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| subpectoral implant-based reconstruction | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Prepectoral Group
- description
- Prepectoral implant-based reconstruction applied for patients in this group
- interventionNames
- Procedure: prepectoral implant-based reconstruction
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Subpectoral Group
- description
- Subpectoral implant-based reconstruction applied for patients in this group
- interventionNames
- Procedure: subpectoral implant-based reconstruction
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Patients' satisfaction
- timeFrame
- 18 months after the operation
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Female
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: 1. More than 18 years old 2. Female 3. Preoperative pathology confirming invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ 4. Clinical T1 and T2 (Maximum tumor diameter ≤5 cm) 5. Clinical ALN negative (Clinical physical examination and ultrasound indicate axillary lymph node negative; Suspected abnormality of axillary lymph node, and fine needle aspiration negative) 6. No clinical or imaging evidence of distant metastasis 7. Patients to receive skin sparing mastectomy or nipple sparing mastectomy 8. BMI \< 35 9. Patients with no or mild mastoptosis 10. Prosthesis to be implanted \<500 ml 11. Be able and willing to sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF) Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with the breast of moderate-severe mastoptosis, or requiring the use of Wise-pattern or other breast lift methods for subcutaneous mammary gland resection 2. BMI\>=35 3. Patients who have received symmetrical breast surgery on the unaffected side immediately or later 4. Patients with locally advanced breast cancer to receive neoadjuvant therapy 5. Patients currently participating in other clinical trials, which may have impact on the participation in this trial 6. Neoadjuvant therapy has been completed, and there is clear indication of adjuvant radiotherapy after the operation 7. Previous history of breast cancer (patients with ipsilateral recurrence after breast sparing surgery) 8. Pregnancy breast-feeding women 9. History of smoking 10. Previous history of diabetes
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available