Extended Systematic Versus Mri-Assisted pRostate Transperineal Biopsy

This is a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) by MRI-targeted approach (MRI-arm) versus 24-core transperineal (TP) systematic biopsy (TP-arm). Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) is defined as ISUP (International Society of Urogenital Pathology) Grade group ≥2 prostate cancer. Patients with elevated PSA 4-20 ng/mL with or without abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) will be randomized in a 1:1 manner to MRI-arm or TP-arm. In the MRI-arm, multiparametric MRI prostate will be performed for each subject. MRI prostate is considered abnormal if PI-RADS (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System, version 2.1) score is 3, 4 or 5. For subjects in MRI-arm with abnormal MRI, MRI-targeted biopsy will be performed, followed by 12-core systematic transperineal biopsy (sparing MRI-target). For subjects in MRI-arm with normal MRI, no biopsy is performed. For subjects in TP-arm, 24-core systematic transperineal biopsy will be performed without MRI guidance. The study flowchart is provided in Figure 1. The detection rates of csPCa will be compared between MRI-targeted biopsy plus 12-core systematic biopsy (in MRI-arm) versus TP-arm. The study hypothesis is MRI-guided prostate biopsy with 12-core systematic biopsy is superior to 24-core transperineal systematic biopsy in detection of csPCa.

Sex

Male

Minimum age

18 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Men ≥18 years of age
2. Clinical suspicion of prostate cancer and indicated for prostate biopsy
3. Serum Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 4-20 ng/mL
4. Digital rectal examination ≤ cT2 (organ confined cancer)
5. Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Prior prostate biopsy
2. Past or current history of prostate cancer
3. MRI prostate performed within past 5 years
4. Contraindicated to undergo MRI scan (e.g. pacemaker in-situ, claustrophobia, estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 50ml/min in serum renal function test within 3 months)
5. Contraindicated to transperineal prostate biopsy: active urinary tract infection, fail insertion of transrectal ultrasound probe into rectum (abdominal perineal resection, anal stenosis), fail to be placed in lithotomy position, uncorrectable coagulopathy, antiplatelet or anticoagulant which cannot be stopped (keep aspirin before and after biopsy is permitted)

• BACKGROUNDCulp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, Bray F, Jemal A. Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):38-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 5. PMID 31493960
• BACKGROUNDChan SY, Ng CF, Lee KW, Yee CH, Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Hou SS. Differences in cancer characteristics of Chinese patients with prostate cancer who present with different symptoms. Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Feb;23(1):6-12. doi: 10.12809/hkmj164875. Epub 2016 Dec 9. PMID 27932742
• BACKGROUNDWong HF, Yee CH, Teoh JY, Chan SY, Chiu PK, Cheung HY, Hou SS, Ng CF. Time trend and characteristics of prostate cancer diagnosed in Hong Kong (China) in the past two decades. Asian J Androl. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):104-106. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_75_18. No abstract available. PMID 30178778
• BACKGROUNDPresti JC Jr, O'Dowd GJ, Miller MC, Mattu R, Veltri RW. Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study. J Urol. 2003 Jan;169(1):125-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64051-7. PMID 12478119
• BACKGROUNDCarter HB, Hamper UM, Sheth S, Sanders RC, Epstein JI, Walsh PC. Evaluation of transrectal ultrasound in the early detection of prostate cancer. J Urol. 1989 Oct;142(4):1008-10. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38971-1. PMID 2677409
• BACKGROUNDChiu PK, Alberts AR, Venderbos LDF, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. Additional benefit of using a risk-based selection for prostate biopsy: an analysis of biopsy complications in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. BJU Int. 2017 Sep;120(3):394-400. doi: 10.1111/bju.13913. Epub 2017 Jun 5. PMID 28498624
• BACKGROUNDChiu PK, Ng CF, Semjonow A, Zhu Y, Vincendeau S, Houlgatte A, Lazzeri M, Guazzoni G, Stephan C, Haese A, Bruijne I, Teoh JY, Leung CH, Casale P, Chiang CH, Tan LG, Chiong E, Huang CY, Wu HC, Nieboer D, Ye DW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. A Multicentre Evaluation of the Role of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in Regions with Differing Prevalence of Prostate Cancer: Adjustment of PHI Reference Ranges is Needed for European and Asian Settings. Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):558-561. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.047. Epub 2018 Nov 2.