Clinical trial · Interventional
Safety of IMRT Treatment With Inhomogeneous Dose in Patients With Relapsed High-grade Gliomas.
Safety of Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Treatment With Inhomogeneous Dose Distribution in Patients With Relapsed High-grade Gliomas.
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Relapsed GBMs have a life expectancy of a few months and re-radiation has proven to be safe in terms of toxicity and effective in increasing OS. One of our studies \[Ciammella P, 2013, 8:222\] reported a median survival of 9.5 months in patients with recurrent GBM and treated with stereotactic radiotherapy with a total dose of 25 Gy in 5 consecutive sessions, in which the dose was prescribed to 70% isodose with a homogeneous gradient towards the center of the target volume. The identification with functional imaging of specific areas with higher tumor cell density, and the possibility of delivering precisely, thanks to the most advanced therapy units, different doses to the different sub-volumes, can lead to an increase in the maximum dose that can be delivered at the expense of the most aggressive areas (with a greater effect on the tumor), compared to smaller doses in areas with lower signal alteration. This selectivity of the doses should allow an increase in the efficacy of the therapy and therefore a hypothetical increase in local control, compared to a radio-induced toxicity on the surrounding healthy tissues almost comparable to that achieved with the previous hypofractionated treatments \[Ciammella P, 2013\]. In fact, delivering many high doses to the entire volume would result in an excess of radio-induced necrosis within the irradiated regions with high dose, as well as the impossibility of minimizing the doses on healthy areas and / or on non-neoplastic critical areas keeping them at internal dose ranges related to minimal and acceptable toxicity levels. Since there are no studies providing clear indications on the acute and late toxicity of irradiated healthy tissues that have already been the subject of a first course of radiotherapy (STUPP), the choice of safety is the primary objective of the study.
Conditions
Conditions (3)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glioblastoma | Glioblastoma | CURATED_BROADER | 0.80 |
| Glioblastoma, Adult | Adult Glioblastoma | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
| Glioblastoma Multiforme | Glioblastoma | CURATED_BROADER | 0.80 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypofractionation guioded by dose painting | Radiation | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Treated with hypofractionation
- description
- 1
- interventionNames
- Radiation: Hypofractionation guioded by dose painting
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Number of adverse events occuring after treatment
- timeFrame
- 3 months
- description
- Evaluation of side effects in order to assess the risk / benefit ratio. Values greater than G3 according to the CTCAE v.4.0 scale will be considered adverse events.
Secondary outcomes (6)
- measure
- Local control according to the RANO criteria
- timeFrame
- 3 months
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: relapsed GBM after standard surgery-radio-chemotherapy treatment or other therapeutic lines or GBM secondary to anaplastic astrocytomas previously treated with RT and chemotherapy or recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas * ECOG Performance Status 0-2, Performance Karnofsky Score\> 60. * Written informed consent. * Life expectancy\> 3 months. * Availability of the patient to be followed for all the phases of the chemotherapy treatment and for the subsequent follow-up.- Exclusion Criteria: Patients with KPS \<70%. * Participation in other studies that involve the administration of experimental drugs or explicitly exclude the possibility of participating in other studies in general or in studies whose features include aspects of this study. * Any concurrent medical or psychological condition that may prevent participation in the study or compromise the ability to provide informed consent. * Pregnant and lactating patients
References
Publications (6)
- BACKGROUNDCiammella P, Podgornii A, Galeandro M, D'Abbiero N, Pisanello A, Botti A, Cagni E, Iori M, Iotti C. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy for recurrent glioblastoma: single institutional experience. Radiat Oncol. 2013 Sep 25;8:222. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-222. PMID 24066926
- BACKGROUNDFranco P, De Bari B, Ciammella P, Fiorentino A, Chiesa S, Amelio D, Pinzi V, Bonomo P, Vagge S, Fiore M, Comito T, Cecconi A, Mortellaro G, Bruni A, Trovo M, Filippi AR, Greto D, Alongi F; AIRO Giovani Italian Association of Radiation Oncology, Young Members Working Group. The role of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in oncological and non-oncological clinical settings: highlights from the 7th Meeting of AIRO--Young Members Working Group (AIRO Giovani). Tumori. 2014 Nov-Dec;100(6):e214-9. doi: 10.1700/1778.19280. PMID 25688503
- BACKGROUNDFilippi AR, Ciammella P, Piva C, Ragona R, Botto B, Gavarotti P, Merli F, Vitolo U, Iotti C, Ricardi U. Involved-site image-guided intensity modulated versus 3D conformal radiation therapy in early stage supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jun 1;89(2):370-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.01.041. Epub 2014 Mar 7. PMID 24613810
- BACKGROUNDNavarria P, Minniti G, Clerici E, Tomatis S, Pinzi V, Ciammella P, Galaverni M, Amelio D, Scartoni D, Scoccianti S, Krengli M, Masini L, Draghini L, Maranzano E, Borzillo V, Muto P, Ferrarese F, Fariselli L, Livi L, Pasqualetti F, Fiorentino A, Alongi F, di Monale MB, Magrini S, Scorsetti M. Re-irradiation for recurrent glioma: outcome evaluation, toxicity and prognostic factors assessment. A multicenter study of the Radiation Oncology Italian Association (AIRO). J Neurooncol. 2019 Mar;142(1):59-67. doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-03059-x. Epub 2018 Dec 4. PMID 30515706
- BACKGROUNDCiammella P, Galeandro M, D'Abbiero N, Podgornii A, Pisanello A, Botti A, Cagni E, Iori M, Iotti C. Hypo-fractionated IMRT for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: a 6 year single institutional experience. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Sep;115(9):1609-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Feb 26.