Clinical trial · Observational
Video Consultation During Follow up Surgical Care
Video Consultation During Follow up Care: Effect on Quality of Care and Patient- and Provider Attitude in Patients With Colorectal Cancer
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The aim of this study was to compare the willingness to use and attitude towards VC amongst both patients with colorectal cancer and healthcare providers during follow up care. Second, to determine the satisfaction with the quality of the healthcare provider and the usability of the used VC technology. 50 patients will be asked to choose between video consultation or face-to-face contact at the outpatient surgical clinic.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colorectal Cancer | Malignant Colorectal Neoplasm | CURATED_BROADER | 0.80 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video consultation | Device | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- label
- F2F-Group
- description
- Patients who preferred a traditional F2F-appointment were seen at the outpatient clinic.
- label
- VC-group
- description
- Patients who preferred a video consult were seen over a video connection.
- interventionNames
- Device: Video consultation
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Attitude and satisfaction with video consultation
- timeFrame
- Immediately after the consult
- description
- PAT-VC questionnaire
Secondary outcomes (3)
- measure
- Usability of the video consultation technology
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18 years or older * Fluent in speaking and writing in Dutch * Follow up appointments in which overall progress, new complaints, results with good news and treatment was discussed were considered feasible. Exclusion Criteria: * Introductory appointments * Bad news consultations * Physical examination needed * No access to Internet * No access to a smartphone, tablet or computer with a camera * Not willing to activate their electronic patient portal
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available