Clinical trial · Observational
Improvement of Communicational Skills Between Health Workers and Oncological Patients During Medical Consultative Conversations
Ways to Improve the Efficiency of Communication Between Health Workers and Oncological Patients During Medical Consultative Conversations: an Observational Clinical Study
NCT04506710CI-TRIAL-00052934unknownClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The aim of the study is to identify the specific patterns of communication between doctors and oncological patients during medical consultations and develop recommendations to improve its effectiveness.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prostate Cancer | Malignant Prostate Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audio recording of the counseling conversation | Behavioral | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- label
- Patients with low-risk prostate cancer
- description
- Histologically confirmed low-risk prostate cancer (PSA up to 10 ng / ml; Gleason (3 + 3) = 6 (ISUP 1); tumor stage T2a (low- risk according to the D'Amico scale))
- interventionNames
- Behavioral: Audio recording of the counseling conversation
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Identification the communication techniques used by the doctor in the counseling conversation;
- timeFrame
- 1 year
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Male
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Histologically confirmed prostate cancer; 2. PSA up to 10 ng / ml; Gleason (3 + 3) = 6 (ISUP 1); the stage of the tumor T2a (low- risk according to the D'Amico scale); Exclusion Criteria: 1. Failure of the recording device; 2. Unsatisfactory audio quality.
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available
No reference posted for this study.