Clinical trial · Interventional
Modified Cephalica Venous Access Port Implantation
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
As long term totally implantable central venous access (TIVAPS) was increasingly needed in cancer patient, some modified techniques were introduced to improved the outcome and safety of the port implantation. In this modified technique, the prioritization were the safety and stability of catheter and port placement. Catheter was inserted to the cephalic vein in the deltopectoral groove, in which connected to the port pocket implanted in the anteromedial thorax. Connection was done by percutaenous and Seldinger technique by introducing a special trocar to ensure safety. Long term outcome was satisfactorily good by this technique without and major and minor events.
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chemotherapy Effect | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Oncology | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modified cephalica venous access | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- type
- OTHER
- label
- Standard procedure
- description
- For the conventional TIVAPS with cephalic vein approach, incision was made either in the midline of infraclivular or supraclavicular. Cathether was introduced to the central and then connected to the laterally implanted port in the deltopectoral region. The experience in the local center experienced several pitfalls with this method such as pneumothorax, pinch-off syndrome, compression of the catheter by the clavicle, kinking of the catheter, and loss of patencty.
- interventionNames
- Other: Modified cephalica venous access
Primary outcomes (2)
- measure
- patency of chemoport
- timeFrame
- 10 minutes after the insertion of chemoport
- description
- While flushing 10 ml of saline to chemoport, measure the velocity flow of saline injection. If the saline was complete in less than 1 minute, it was considered normal. difficulty in flushing the chemoport and pain during flushing should be considered as a failure.
- measure
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Female
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Subjects who are planning to receive chemotherapy and need chemoports placement. Exclusion Criteria: * Unconsented subjects
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available