Clinical trial · Observational
PSMA-PET and MRI for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Treatment
PSMA-PET and MRI for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Treatment - a Multicenter Study
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Approximately one third of prostate cancer patients experience biochemical relapse following initial radical prostatectomy or curative radiotherapy. To determine further treatment, it is of utmost importance to accurately differentiate local and regional recurrence from distant metastatic disease. Unfortunately, the currently used medical imaging methods (MRI and bone scan) lack sensitivity for detection of nodal and skeletal metastases, which can lead to over-treatment of patients with occult metastatic disease. PET imaging with prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-ligands has shown a promising potential for improving the detection accuracy in recurrent prostate cancer, especially when combined with the excellent soft-tissue contrast of MRI. However, evidence is mostly based on retrospective single center studies so far, including patients with a wide variety of PSA levels. Improving the sensitivity for detection of metastatic disease is a crucial step in reducing over-treatment of prostate cancer patients with biochemical relapse following radical treatment. The purpose of this prospective multi-center study is to standardize PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI imaging across three university hospitals in Norway, and investigate its merit for detection of recurrent prostate cancer. The long-term overall goal is offering prostate cancer patients a more personalized treatment plan aiming to improve the chances of survival and quality of life.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prostatic Neoplasms | Prostate Neoplasm | ALIAS | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSMA PET/CT | Diagnostic Test | — | UNRESOLVED |
| PSMA PET/MR | Diagnostic Test | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- label
- relapse after radical treatment for prostate cancer
- description
- prostate cancer patients with biochemical relapse following radical treatment, or patients with persistently elevated PSA levels after radical prostatectomy, that have been (or will be) referred to PSMA PET/CT and PSMA PET/MRI at one of the participating hospitals.
- interventionNames
- Diagnostic Test: PSMA PET/CT
- Diagnostic Test: PSMA PET/MR
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Detection rates of prostate cancer recurrence after radical treatment using a standardized imaging protocol consisting of PSMA PET/CT and PET/MR
- timeFrame
- baseline
- description
- Consensus scoring and decision by nuclear medicine physician and radiologist on presence of local recurrent or metastatic lesions
Secondary outcomes (10)
- measure
- Differences in detection rates between 68Ga- and 18F-PSMA tracers
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Male
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria (surgery cohort): * Prostate cancer patients with biochemical relapse in accordance with the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on prostate cancer; two consecutive measurements with PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml following radical prostatectomy or PSA \> 2.0 ng/ml above the nadir following definitive radiotherapy * Potential candidates for loco-regional pelvic salvage treatment based on age and co-morbidity Exclusion Criteria: * Previous salvage therapy for recurrent prostate cancer * General contra-indications for an MRI exam (pacemaker, aneurysm clips, any form of metal in the body, or severe claustrophobia) * Serious concomitant systemic disorders or reduced cognitive functioning that in the opinion of the investigator would compromise the patient's ability to complete the study or interfere with the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the study objectives * Impaired renal function defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 * Hormonal treatment during the last three months
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available