Clinical trial · Interventional
Two Low Volume Regimens for Colorectal Cancer Screening Colonoscopy
Eficacia y Tolerabilidad de Dos Productos de Volumen Reducido Para la Colonoscopia de Cribado: Ensayo Comparativo Paralelo Aleatorizado
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Colorectal cancer is the first neoplasm most commonly diagnosed in both sexes and the second leading cause of cancer death in Spain. Colorectal cancer screening Program in Barcelona was implanted in 2009 and approximately 1,500 colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies are performed annually at Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. Adequate colon preparation (anterograde cleansing with laxatives) improves polyp detection, decreases examination time, and complications. There are both low and high volume intestinal regimens with polyethylene glycol (PEG) as the main active ingredient or without it. Hypothesis: Two low volumen regimens, 1L PEG plus ascorbate and magnesium citrate plus picosulphate, at starting doses have the same Adenoma Detection Rate as cleansing solutions in preparation for screening colonoscopy.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colorectal Cancer | Malignant Colorectal Neoplasm | CURATED_BROADER | 0.80 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plenvu | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Plenvu
- description
- Plenvu split dose
- interventionNames
- Drug: Plenvu
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Citrafleet
- description
- citrafleet in split dose
- interventionNames
- Drug: Plenvu
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Adenoma detection rate
- timeFrame
- 2 years
- description
- The percentage of patients with at least one adenoma in relation to the total subjects in each group of study
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 50 Years
- Maximum age
- 69 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Men and women aged 50 to 69 years who have participated in the early detection programme for colon and rectal cancer (PDPCCR) in Barcelona, who have obtained a positive result in the faecal occult blood test (≥20 μg Hb/g faeces) and who are scheduled for a screening colonoscopy at Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. Exclusion Criteria: * People who do not agree to participate in the study. * People with known severe renal failure (grade IV or V) and grade III and IV heart failure according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Scale of Functional Assessment of Heart Failure * Individuals who have undergone a colonoscopy in the past year. * Subjects meeting the Rome IV Criteria for the diagnosis of functional constipation * Subjects with mental disabilities or with a severe mental disorder (schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, recurrent severe major depressive disorders, severe obsessive-compulsive disorder, severe personality disorders and bipolar disorders). * Individuals who do not understand Catalan or Spanish verbally and in writing. * Individuals with partial or total colon resection. * Individuals with a personal history of CRC or colorectal disease amenable to specific follow-up (ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, or colorectal adenomas). * Individuals with terminal illness or severe illness/disability that contraindicates further study of the colon. * People with gastrointestinal disorders that contraindicate the use of the study products (gastric emptying disorders, perforation or gastrointestinal obstruction, ileus, toxic megacolon). * People with congestive heart failure * Hypermagnesemia * Rhabdomyolysis * Phenylketourine * Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency * People with hypersensitivity to the active ingredients of excipients * People with severe renal impairment
References
Publications (9)
- BACKGROUNDHautefeuille G, Lapuelle J, Chaussade S, Ponchon T, Molard BR, Coulom P, Laugier R, Henri F, Cadiot G. Factors related to bowel cleansing failure before colonoscopy: Results of the PACOME study. United European Gastroenterol J. 2014 Feb;2(1):22-9. doi: 10.1177/2050640613518200. PMID 24918005
- BACKGROUNDSchreiber S, Baumgart DC, Drenth JPH, Filip RS, Clayton LB, Hylands K, Repici A, Hassan C; DAYB Study Group. Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized phase 3 trial. Endoscopy. 2019 Jan;51(1):73-84. doi: 10.1055/a-0639-5070. Epub 2018 Jul 19. PMID 30025415
- BACKGROUNDBisschops R, Manning J, Clayton LB, Ng Kwet Shing R, Alvarez-Gonzalez M; MORA Study Group. Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus 2 L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate: a randomized phase 3 trial. Endoscopy. 2019 Jan;51(1):60-72. doi: 10.1055/a-0638-8125. Epub 2018 Jul 19. PMID 30025414
- BACKGROUNDDeMicco MP, Clayton LB, Pilot J, Epstein MS; NOCT Study Group. Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):677-687.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.047. Epub 2017 Aug 10. PMID 28803744
- BACKGROUNDSeo SI, Kang JG, Kim HS, Jang MK, Kim HY, Shin WG. Efficacy and tolerability of 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 May;33(5):541-548. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-2989-7. Epub 2018 Mar 1. PMID 29497812
- BACKGROUNDLee SW, Bang CS, Park TY, Suk KT, Baik GH, Kim DJ. Split-dose Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: 2 Liters Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid versus Sodium Picosulfate versus Oral Sodium Phosphate Tablets. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug 25;70(2):89-95. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2017.70.2.89.