Clinical trial · Observational
Comparison of PET/CT and Ultrasound in Staging of Malignant Melanoma
Comparison of 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT and Ultrasound in Staging of Patients With Malignant Melanoma: An Analysis in a Single Patient Population
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
This is the first study which evaluates the different staging modalities 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET/CT (PET/CT) and diagnostic ultrasound (US) in a single patient cohort with malignant melanoma (MM). Previous analyses are ambivalent regarding the modality of choice. These analyses, however, compared separate patient cohorts for each modality. Inclusion criteria were a primary staging or re-staging of suspected or confirmed MM with one or more PET/CT and/or one or more US. Exclusion criteria were the non-existence of a malignancy or a malignancy other than MM, alone or in combination with an MM. The analysis includes the calculation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy in a per-patient (PPA), per-examination (PEA) and per-lesion analysis (PLA). This was done individually for PET/CT and US, and in PLA also for the combination of these two radiological modalities. Furthermore, US was divided into US as a whole (wUS), peripheral lymph nodes (pUS) and/or abdomen (aUS). The principle equivalence of the two imaging modalities is set up as a null hypothesis H0 in all three analyses. As a further null hypothesis H0, the equivalence of the combined application compared to the sole applications of the two imaging modalities is asserted. The aim is the refutation of the null hypothesis H0 by significant differences in sensitivity and specificity.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Malignant Melanoma | Melanoma | ALIAS | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT and/or Ultrasound | Diagnostic Test | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- label
- Patients with malignant melanoma
- description
- 258 patients (w: 112, m: 146 age: 61±16 years) met the primary inclusion criteria. They were all examined by 18F-FDG PET/CT, 176 patients additionally by US (peripheral lymph nodes (pUS) and/or abdomen (aUS)).
- interventionNames
- Diagnostic Test: Imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT and/or Ultrasound
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and ultrasound regarding the detection of primary tumours and metastases of melanoma
- timeFrame
- September 1998 - August 2014
- description
- The principle equivalence of the two imaging modalities is set up as a null hypothesis H0 in a per-patient (PPA), per-examination (PEA) and per-lesion analysis (PLA). As a further null hypothesis H0, the equivalence of the combined application compared to the sole applications of the two imaging modalities is asserted. The aim is the refutation of the null hypothesis H0 by significant differences in sensitivity and specificity.
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * the existence of malignant melanoma (MM) as primary tumour or metastases Exclusion Criteria: * the non-existence of a malignancy, * a malignancy other than MM, alone or in combination with an MM
References
Publications (1)
- BACKGROUNDXing Y, Bronstein Y, Ross MI, Askew RL, Lee JE, Gershenwald JE, Royal R, Cormier JN. Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jan 19;103(2):129-42. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq455. Epub 2010 Nov 16. PMID 21081714