Clinical trial · Observational
Incidence of The Bowel, Bladder, and Sexual Dysfunction Following Surgery for Colorectal Malignancy
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer by the site in Europe and the third most common cancer in the USA with high morbidity and mortality. Survival after the treatment has improved over the past few decades as a result of early diagnosis, radiotherapy, and advances in surgical techniques such as abdominoperineal resection (APR), low anterior resection (LAR) and total mesorectal excision (TME). These innovative surgeries are the current standard treatment for the mid and the low rectal cancers which avoids the permanent colostomy. It is very difficult to find out the incidence of the bowel, bladder and sexual dysfunction of patients either because they are embarrassed or because they do not relate their symptoms to rectal cancer treatment. This article reports the incidence of the bowel, bladder and sexual dysfunction following surgery for rectal cancer from the National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, a tertiary level hospital.
Conditions
Conditions (4)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bladder Dysfunction | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Bowel Dysfunction | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Colorectal Surgery | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Sexual Dysfunction | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgery for Colorectal malignant diseases either LAR or APR | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- label
- Bowel, Bladder, and Sexual Dysfunction group
- description
- Out of 38 patients included for surgery 12 were excluded due to poor follow up and those patients who underwent upfront surgery. Only 26 patients were included in the study. There were 20 (76.9%) males and 6 (23.1%) females respectively. The mean age of the patient was 43.577yrs (26-75) and mean BMI was 20.78. The number of patients that underwent LAR was 24 (92.30%) and those who underwent APR were 2( 7.6%) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy respectively.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Surgery for Colorectal malignant diseases either LAR or APR
Primary outcomes (3)
- measure
- Bowel Dysfunction
- timeFrame
- 6 months
- description
- Self reported urgency, fecal incontinence (either flatus or stool), difficulty in the evacuation. It is calculated using LARS Score Questionnaire which consists of five questions and can be used to generate an overall score that translates into no LARS (score 0-20), minor LARS (21-29), and major LARS (30-42) respectively.
- measure
- Bladder Dysfunction
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 75 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: 1\) All the patients who underwent LAR and APR following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Exclusion Criteria: 1. All the patients with recurrence after surgery, 2. Lost to follow up, 3. Benign disease, 4. Patients who did not undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and 5. Patients who underwent trans-anal excision.
References
Publications (18)
- BACKGROUNDJuul T, Ahlberg M, Biondo S, Espin E, Jimenez LM, Matzel KE, Palmer GJ, Sauermann A, Trenti L, Zhang W, Laurberg S, Christensen P. Low anterior resection syndrome and quality of life: an international multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 May;57(5):585-91. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000116. PMID 24819098
- BACKGROUNDSiegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. Epub 2019 Jan 8. PMID 30620402
- BACKGROUNDHawkins AT, Albutt K, Wise PE, Alavi K, Sudan R, Kaiser AM, Bordeianou L; Continuing Education Committee of the SSAT. Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer in the Twenty-First Century: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Aug;22(8):1477-1487. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3750-9. Epub 2018 Apr 16. PMID 29663303
- BACKGROUNDYeom SS, Park IJ, Jung SW, Oh SH, Lee JL, Yoon YS, Kim CW, Lim SB, Kim N, Yu CS, Kim JC. Outcomes of patients with abdominoperineal resection (APR) and low anterior resection (LAR) who had very low rectal cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Oct;96(43):e8249. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008249. PMID 29068989
- BACKGROUNDHeald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1986 Jun 28;1(8496):1479-82. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91510-2. PMID 2425199
- BACKGROUNDJuul T, Ahlberg M, Biondo S, Emmertsen KJ, Espin E, Jimenez LM, Matzel KE, Palmer G, Sauermann A, Trenti L, Zhang W, Laurberg S, Christensen P. International validation of the low anterior resection syndrome score. Ann Surg. 2014 Apr;259(4):728-34. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828fac0b. PMID 23598379
- BACKGROUNDAdam JP, Denost Q, Capdepont M, van Geluwe B, Rullier E. Prospective and Longitudinal Study of Urogenital Dysfunction After Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Sep;59(9):822-30. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000652.