Clinical trial · Observational
Prospective Comparisons of Clinical Trial and Real-world Outcomes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Prospective Comparisons of Survival Outcomes, Safety Profile, and Probability of Returning to Society Between Three Randomized Controlled Trials and Real-world Evidence in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Study results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) usually have been found not adequately inform practice. A RCT is optimized to determine efficacy, while real-world study is conducted in a routine care setting aimed to determine effectiveness. Thus, it is necessary to evaluate the pragmatism of clinical trials for a better understanding of the external generalizability. Nonetheless, comparative pragmatic features of RCTs and real-world studies still lack well elucidation. By capitalizing on a nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)-specific big-data, real-world database and individual patient data extracted from three landmark RCTs, investigators conducted the direct comparison of NPC cohorts receiving same treatment strategy in clinical trial versus real-world settings, and examined the comparative pragmatic features and their influences on survival outcomes, safety profile, and the probability of returning to society.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma | Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trial setting | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (4)
- label
- CCRT-randomized clinical trial
- description
- Trial patients receiving CCRT
- interventionNames
- Other: Trial setting
- label
- CCRT-real-world database
- description
- Patients receiving CCRT from real-world database
- label
- IC+CCRT-randomized clinical trial
- description
- Trial patients receiving IC+CCRT
- interventionNames
- Other: Trial setting
- label
- IC+CCRT-real-world database
- description
- Patients receiving IC+CCRT from real-world database
Primary outcomes (6)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 8 Years
- Maximum age
- 79 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients treated in our center from April 2009 to December 2016; 2. All patients were pathologically diagnosed, non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma; 3. Only included cases staged as T3-4N1 \& T1-4N2-3 according to the 6th or 7th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer / Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) system; 4. For trial patients, treatment strategies only limited to concurrent chemoradiotherapy, induction chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, or concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with adjuvant chemotherapy; 5. For patients from real-world database, patients are permitted to receive additional targeted therapy to standard chemoradiotherapy, as far as it met clinical needs and was approved by physicians. 6. The patient's basic information, prognosis related data, and follow-up data are complete. Exclusion Criteria: 1. The clinical stage of T3-4N0 was excluded; 2. Cases from large real-world databases need to exclude patients who participate in clinical trials;
References
Publications (5)
- BACKGROUNDChen L, Hu CS, Chen XZ, Hu GQ, Cheng ZB, Sun Y, Li WX, Chen YY, Xie FY, Liang SB, Chen Y, Xu TT, Li B, Long GX, Wang SY, Zheng BM, Guo Y, Sun Y, Mao YP, Tang LL, Chen YM, Liu MZ, Ma J. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Feb;13(2):163-71. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70320-5. Epub 2011 Dec 7. PMID 22154591
- BACKGROUNDSun Y, Li WF, Chen NY, Zhang N, Hu GQ, Xie FY, Sun Y, Chen XZ, Li JG, Zhu XD, Hu CS, Xu XY, Chen YY, Hu WH, Guo L, Mo HY, Chen L, Mao YP, Sun R, Ai P, Liang SB, Long GX, Zheng BM, Feng XL, Gong XC, Li L, Shen CY, Xu JY, Guo Y, Chen YM, Zhang F, Lin L, Tang LL, Liu MZ, Ma J. Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):1509-1520. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30410-7. Epub 2016 Sep 27. PMID 27686945
- BACKGROUNDZhang Y, Chen L, Hu GQ, Zhang N, Zhu XD, Yang KY, Jin F, Shi M, Chen YP, Hu WH, Cheng ZB, Wang SY, Tian Y, Wang XC, Sun Y, Li JG, Li WF, Li YH, Tang LL, Mao YP, Zhou GQ, Sun R, Liu X, Guo R, Long GX, Liang SQ, Li L, Huang J, Long JH, Zang J, Liu QD, Zou L, Su QF, Zheng BM, Xiao Y, Guo Y, Han F, Mo HY, Lv JW, Du XJ, Xu C, Liu N, Li YQ, Chua MLK, Xie FY, Sun Y, Ma J. Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Induction Chemotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 19;381(12):1124-1135. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1905287. Epub 2019 May 31. PMID 31150573
- BACKGROUNDBooth CM, Tannock IF. Randomised controlled trials and population-based observational research: partners in the evolution of medical evidence. Br J Cancer. 2014 Feb 4;110(3):551-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.725. Epub 2014 Jan 14. No abstract available. PMID 24495873
- BACKGROUNDPrince RM, Atenafu EG, Krzyzanowska MK. Hospitalizations During Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of Real World vs Clinical Trial Outcomes. JAMA Oncol. 2015 Dec;1(9):1333-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3440.