Clinical trial · Observational
Evaluation of the Decision-making During Multidisciplinary Meetings for Digestive Cancers
Prospective Evaluation of the Decision-making During Multidisciplinary Meetings for Digestive Cancers
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Nowadays, the recommended approach for decision-making for oncology patients is based on multidisciplinary meetings (MDT). However, the quality of decision-making during MDT depends on other factors such as the quality of presentation of clinical cases, the degree of participation of different specialists. In this study, the investigators will evaluate the decision-making during digestive oncology MDT using the validated "Metric Of Decision-Making" tool (MDT-MODe), in the national institute of oncology (Rabat, Morocco).
Conditions
Conditions (4)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decision Making | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Neoplasms/Therapy | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Patient Care Team | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Quality of Health Care | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| response to questionnary | Behavioral | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (0)
[]Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- MODE-MDT scores
- timeFrame
- 60 days from the multidisciplinary team meeting
- description
- The scores of the Metric Of Decision-Making tool during multidisciplinary team meeting for digestive cancer. The instrument include 10 questions rated from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate better results. The instrument include questions about the quality of clinical information (History, radiological, pathological, comorbid health conditions, psychosocial issues, and patients' views) and the contribution to team decision making of key professional groups (Surgeons, physicians, oncologists, nurses, allied healthcare professionals, radiologists, pathologists and MDT coordinators) ans a question about the decision (Clear, deferred, no decision. Each question is analyzed separately (mean, median, standard deviation, quartiles).
Secondary outcomes (2)
- measure
- Decision reached
- timeFrame
- 60 days from the multidisciplinary team meeting
- description
- The rate of cases with decisions during multidisciplinary team meetings (Clear decision about treatment in the MODE-MDT instrument).
- measure
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * All consecutive cases presented during multidisciplinary cancer meeting for digestive cancer. Exclusion Criteria: * Cases not registered in the electronic health record system.
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available