Clinical trial · Interventional
Carbon PEEK Versus Titanium Pedicle Screws in the Treatment of Spinal Tumors
Carbon PEEK Versus Titanium Pedicle Screws in the Treatment of Spinal Tumors - A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 26, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260926-000001
Why stopped (as posted): Absence of Co-investigator
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Radiation therapy is a cornerstone in the treatment of spinal neoplasms as radical resections are often limited anatomically. Frequently, a surgical stabilization with implants is required. However, metallic implants not only make the CT-based planning of a subsequent radiation therapy more difficult, but might also have an uncontrolled dose modulating effect in adjuvant radiotherapy. At the spine, radiation is limited by the effective dose posed to the relatively radiosensitive spinal cord. While metallic implants might result in an inhomogeneous and uncontrollable dose distribution due to the interface effect, the use of new radiolucent implants consisting of carbon/polyether ether ketone (PEEK) might allow a more homogeneous and predictable dose distribution. This study aims to evaluate the potential benefits of the use of carbon/PEEK pedicle screws during adjuvant radiation therapy and follow-up imaging of spinal tumors. 60 patients will randomized 1:1 into either treatment arm (Pedicle System Carbon/PEEK vs. Pedicle System Titanium). The feasibility of planning the radiation therapy will be evaluated. The postoperatively administered total radiation dose is documented. The radiological visualization of the area of interest will be evaluated The surgical outcome is evaluated by fusion rate, implant integrity and anchorage. Patients will be followed up for 12 months according to local standards.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spinal Tumor | Spinal Cord Neoplasm | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| surgical stabilization of the spine due to primary and secondary spinal tumors | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Instrumentation with Carbon/PEEK pedicle screw system
- description
- Posterior instrumentation using a Carbon/PEEK pedicle screw system two levels above and below the affected segment(s). The medical device is a commercial product, bears a conformity marking and is used in accordance with the instructions.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: surgical stabilization of the spine due to primary and secondary spinal tumors
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Instrumentation with titanium pedicle screw system
- description
- Posterior instrumentation using a titanium pedicle screw system two levels above and below the affected segment(s). The medical device is a commercial product, bears a conformity marking and is used in accordance with the instructions.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: surgical stabilization of the spine due to primary and secondary spinal tumors
Primary outcomes (2)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 99 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients 18 to 99 years of Age * Primary and secondary spinal tumors of the thoracolumbar spine requiring posterior instrumentation and radiation therapy Exclusion Criteria: * Need of cement augmentation or anterior cage support (corpectomy) * Patients with contraindication against surgical resection * Patients with incomplete medical records or insufficient imaging
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available