Clinical trial · Interventional
Translational Development of Photon-counting CT Imaging
Translational Development of Photon-Counting CT Imaging
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Using an investigational CT scanner which uses a new type of detector to capture X-rays, (a photon counting CT detector), the goal of this experimental study is to compare conventional CT images to CT images using the photon counting detector in patients undergoing CT scans for clinically indicated reasons. The main question it aims to answer is whether the images produced using the new detectors are superior in quality. Participants will undergo the clinically indicated CT images and the photon counting detector CT images of a limited area during the same examination time.
Conditions
Conditions (4)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cancer | Malignant Neoplasm | ALIAS | 0.90 |
| Inflammatory Disease | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Metabolic Bone Disease | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Vascular Diseases | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| PHOTON COUNTING CT Scanner | Device | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Patients undergoing conventional and Photon Counting CT scan on the investigational scanner
- description
- 18 and older patients who undergo the conventional CT scan and the photon counting CT (PCCT) scan. Patient's images on the conventional scanner provide internal control to compare to the PCCT images.
- interventionNames
- Device: PHOTON COUNTING CT Scanner
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Mean Difference in Diagnostic Image Quality Grading of Photon Counting CT vs Conventional CT Images.
- timeFrame
- 2 years and 3 months, 27 months
- description
- Mean difference in relative image quality grading of CT images using Photon counting detectors vs. conventional detectors in group of patients with various clinical conditions. Scale name "Visual grading analysis (VGA)" . Expert radiologist observers compare the relative grades of the images from the PCCT to the grades of the same patient's reference images from conventional CT acquired at the same time. The visual grading scale incorporates technical factors in the acquisition and image display (such as contrast, noise and presence of artifacts and post processing). Grading is based on 5 point scale. 1- lowest image quality, 5- highest image quality. 5 is a better result. Scale as follows: 1 Images not usable- severe limitations for diagnostic use, 2 Limited -some loss of information, significant limitations for clinical use, 3 Adequate -moderate limitations for diagnostic use, 4 Good-minimal limitations for clinical use, 5 Excellent- no limitations for clinical diagnosis.
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
* INCLUSION CRITERIA: * NIH patients currently on an NIH research protocol who are referred to RAD\&IS for CT examination as part of that research protocol * 18 years old or greater * Able to understand and sign informed consent EXCLUSION CRITERIA: * Studies that specifically require simultaneous dual source CT scan capability or where dual source CT scan is requested * Studies ordered for an emergency indication * Pregnant women. Subjects of child-bearing potential will undergo serum or urine pregnancy testing within 72 hours before examination. Post-menopausal and surgically sterilized subjects are automatically exempt from this testing * Lactating women who are unable to stop breast feeding for 24 hours following the administration of contrast * Body weight \>500 lbs (227 kg) or a body circumference that prevents the study subject from lying flat in the scanner * Patients who have undergone PCCT examination within the past year. * Any contraindications that the research team identifies from the subject, RAD\&IS CT questionnaires, and/or History and Assessment * Employees or staff supervised by the Principal Investigator or an Associate will not be recruited to participate
References
Publications (3)
- BACKGROUNDSymons R, Pourmorteza A, Sandfort V, Ahlman MA, Cropper T, Mallek M, Kappler S, Ulzheimer S, Mahesh M, Jones EC, Malayeri AA, Folio LR, Bluemke DA. Feasibility of Dose-reduced Chest CT with Photon-counting Detectors: Initial Results in Humans. Radiology. 2017 Dec;285(3):980-989. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162587. Epub 2017 Jul 28. PMID 28753389
- BACKGROUNDPourmorteza A, Symons R, Henning A, Ulzheimer S, Bluemke DA. Dose Efficiency of Quarter-Millimeter Photon-Counting Computed Tomography: First-in-Human Results. Invest Radiol. 2018 Jun;53(6):365-372. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000463. PMID 29595753
- BACKGROUNDPourmorteza A, Symons R, Reich DS, Bagheri M, Cork TE, Kappler S, Ulzheimer S, Bluemke DA. Photon-Counting CT of the Brain: In Vivo Human Results and Image-Quality Assessment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Dec;38(12):2257-2263. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5402. Epub 2017 Oct 5. PMID 28982793