Clinical trial · Interventional
Prospective Clinical Safety and Efficacy Study of Lesion-targeted MRI-TULSA for Localized Prostate Cancer
Prospective Clinical Safety and Efficacy Study of Lesion-targeted MRI-guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation for Localized Prostate Cancer
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has improved detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (MRI-TULSA) system incorporates precise diagnosis and simultaneous ablation of prostate tissue enabling lesion-targeted treatment of PCa. Lesion-based treatment strategy spares surrounding healthy tissues from injury, which may improve the outcome of genitourinary function. This study further investigates the safety and the efficacy of lesion-targeted ablation of MRI-visible biopsy-proven PCa with MRI-TULSA.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Localized Prostate Cancer | Malignant Prostate Neoplasm | CURATED_BROADER | 0.78 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRI-TULSA | Device | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Lesion-targeted ablation with MRI-TULSA
- description
- Intervention: Targeted lesion based thermoablation of MRI-visible biopsy proven clinically significant prostate cancer. Ablative effect is aimed to cover lesion with 5 mm MRI based healthy tissue overlap wherever possible but not compromising viability of critical tissues, mainly the wall of rectum.
- interventionNames
- Device: MRI-TULSA
Primary outcomes (2)
- measure
- Severe adverse event free survival
- timeFrame
- 3 months
- description
- The primary safety outcome is the freedom from severe adverse events over 3 months follow up: Clavien Dindo Classification of surgical complication is graded from 1 (mild) to 5 (death). Severe adverse events are regarded as events graded ≥3.
- measure
- Oncological efficacy: Disease free survival
- timeFrame
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Male
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 95 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Language spoken: Finnish, English or Swedish * Mental status: Patients must be able to understand the meaning of the study * Informed consent: The patient must sign the appropriate Ethics Committee (EC) approved informed consent documents in the presence of the designated staff. * Biopsy-confirmed acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate * Gleason score ≥ 3+4/International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥ 2 * High volume Gleason score 6 as determined on biopsies (\>2 positive cancer core or ≥ 50% cancer in a core) * Patient presenting low volume Gleason score 6 disease and refuses active surveillance * Non-metastatic disease; high-risk patients according to European Association of Urology risk group stratification will undergo F-Prostate specific membrane antigen-Positron Emission Tomography/Computer Tomography to exclude distant metastasis * Lesion visible on MRI (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v2 4-5) * Eligible for general anesthesia (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)≤ 3) Exclusion Criteria: * Contraindications for MRI (cardiac pacemaker, intracranial clips etc.) * Acute unresolved urinary tract infection * Claustrophobia * Hip replacement surgery or other metal in the pelvic area * Known allergy to gadolinium * Inability to insert urinary catheter * Suspected tumor on baseline MRI further than 30 mm or within 3 mm of the prostatic urethra * Prostate calcifications or cysts obstructing planned ultrasound beam path within the targeted tissue volume * Any other conditions that might compromise patient safety, based on the clinical judgment of the responsible urologist
References
Publications (13)
- BACKGROUNDFenton JJ, Weyrich MS, Durbin S, Liu Y, Bang H, Melnikow J. Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening for Prostate Cancer: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1914-1931. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3712. PMID 29801018
- BACKGROUNDKlotz L, Vesprini D, Sethukavalan P, Jethava V, Zhang L, Jain S, Yamamoto T, Mamedov A, Loblaw A. Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 20;33(3):272-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1192. Epub 2014 Dec 15. PMID 25512465
- BACKGROUNDHamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, Davis M, Peters TJ, Turner EL, Martin RM, Oxley J, Robinson M, Staffurth J, Walsh E, Bollina P, Catto J, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Powell P, Prescott S, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Neal DE; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220. Epub 2016 Sep 14. PMID 27626136
- BACKGROUNDWilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ, Andriole GL, Culkin D, Wheeler T, Aronson WJ, Brawer MK. Follow-up of Prostatectomy versus Observation for Early Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 13;377(2):132-142. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615869. PMID 28700844
- BACKGROUNDBill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, Rider JR, Taari K, Busch C, Nordling S, Haggman M, Andersson SO, Spangberg A, Andren O, Palmgren J, Steineck G, Adami HO, Johansson JE. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):932-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311593. PMID 24597866
- BACKGROUNDDonovan JL, Hamdy FC, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Walsh E, Blazeby JM, Peters TJ, Holding P, Bonnington S, Lennon T, Bradshaw L, Cooper D, Herbert P, Howson J, Jones A, Lyons N, Salter E, Thompson P, Tidball S, Blaikie J, Gray C, Bollina P, Catto J, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Powell P, Prescott S, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Davis M, Turner EL, Martin RM, Neal DE; ProtecT Study Group*. Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1425-1437. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606221. Epub 2016 Sep 14.