Clinical trial · Observational
Tissue Expansion in Breast Reconstruction Without Drains
Tissue Expansion in Breast Reconstruction Without Drains: A Study Using a Tissue Expander That Collects Periprosthetic Fluid
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The primary objective of this small feasibility pilot study is to demonstrate that implant-based breast reconstruction (after treatment for cancer) can successfully be performed without prolonged drain placement, using a tissue expander with a reservoir and in-office transcutaneous fluid aspiration. Secondly, the investigators aim to provide enough confidence in this technique that a larger study can be performed to demonstrate fewer complications (infection, drain-related pain and re-operation rates) when compared to the use of conventional tissue expanders and/or implants with prolonged drain placement.
Conditions
Conditions (3)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breast Cancer | Malignant Breast Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
| Breast Implant; Complications | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insertion of Tissue Expander with Fluid Reservoir | Device | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- label
- All patients in study
- description
- 5 consecutive patients with breast cancer or a breast cancer-causing gene that elect to undergo bilateral breast reconstruction will be Insertion of Tissue Expander with Fluid Reservoir as the first stage of reconstruction. Post-surgical care will be similar as patients with conventional expanders, except that during office visits, fluid will be transcutaneously aspirated from the fluid reservoir on each side.
- interventionNames
- Device: Insertion of Tissue Expander with Fluid Reservoir
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Number of patients with successful breast reconstruction using reservoir-expanders
- timeFrame
- 4-6 months
- description
- The number of patients that successfully complete two stage implant-based breast reconstruction with fluid-reservoir tissue expanders and early drain removal. An outcome failure would be if the expander required removal due to uncontrolled seroma, infection or other factor that prevents a successful implant-based reconstruction.
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Female
- Minimum age
- 21 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients undergoing bilateral breast reconstruction following mastectomy (performed to treat stage I-III breast cancer or for prevention of breast cancer). * Non-smokers * BMI less than 31 * No other significant surgical risk factors that make elective use of implants dangerous (e.g., presence of a pacemaker, frail health, dependence on blood thinners, uncontrolled diabetes, bleeding tendencies, autoimmune disorders, immune compromise) Exclusion Criteria: * Unilateral mastectomy patients * Current smokers * Those with bleeding dyscrasias or clotting disorders * Those who have had or will have a full axillary lymph node dissection * Cases where there is an unusually high degree of bleeding intra-operatively (more than 150 cc) * Those with a BMI greater than 30 * Those with history of prior breast surgery (aside from lumpectomy or needle biopsy) * Those with a history of prior breast radiation * Those with stage IV or unresectable breast cancer * Significant surgical risk factors that make elective use of implants dangerous (e.g., presence of a pacemaker, frail health, dependence on blood thinners, uncontrolled diabetes, bleeding tendencies, autoimmune disorders, immune compromise)
References
Publications (13)
- BACKGROUNDSmith JM, Broyles JM, Guo Y, Tuffaha SH, Mathes D, Sacks JM. Human acellular dermis increases surgical site infection and overall complication profile when compared with submuscular breast reconstruction: An updated meta-analysis incorporating new products✰. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Nov;71(11):1547-1556. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jul 6. PMID 30093286
- BACKGROUNDKim JYS, Davila AA, Persing S, Connor CM, Jovanovic B, Khan SA, Fine N, Rawlani V. A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan;129(1):28-41. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182361fd6. PMID 22186498
- BACKGROUNDOllech CJ, Block LM, Afifi AM, Poore SO. Effect of Drain Placement on Infection, Seroma, and Return to Operating Room in Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Dec;79(6):536-540. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001174. PMID 28671886
- BACKGROUNDSrivastava V, Basu S, Shukla VK. Seroma formation after breast cancer surgery: what we have learned in the last two decades. J Breast Cancer. 2012 Dec;15(4):373-80. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.373. Epub 2012 Dec 31. PMID 23346164
- BACKGROUNDSampathraju S, Rodrigues G. Seroma formation after mastectomy: pathogenesis and prevention. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2010 Dec;1(4):328-33. doi: 10.1007/s13193-011-0067-5. Epub 2011 Apr 2. PMID 22693384
- BACKGROUNDMurray JD, Elwood ET, Jones GE, Barrick R, Feng J. Decreasing expander breast infection: A new drain care protocol. Can J Plast Surg. 2009 Spring;17(1):17-21. PMID 20190908
- BACKGROUNDCarcoforo P, Soliani G, Maestroni U, Donini A, Inderbitzin D, Hui TT, Lefor A, Avital I, Navarra G. Octreotide in the treatment of lymphorrhea after axillary node dissection: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Mar;196(3):365-9. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01757-X.