Clinical trial · Observational
Comparison of Tumor Efficacy Safety in Laparoscopic Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Between Favorable and Unfavorable Site
Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial for Comparison of Tumor Efficacy Safety in Laparoscopic Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Between Favorable and Unfavorable Site(FUGES-016)
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Participants with gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GIST) were divided into favorable and unfavorable sites according to the anatomical site of the tumor, and this study aims to validate the overall postoperative morbidity and mortality rates between favorable site receiving laparoscopic resection of GIST and that of unfavorable site under the currently standard surgical therapy.
Conditions
Conditions (4)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complication | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Gastric Cancer | Malignant Gastric Neoplasm | CURATED_BROADER | 0.80 |
| GIST of Stomach | Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor | ALIAS | 0.90 |
| Surgery | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laparoscopic resection | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- label
- Group A (Study group)
- description
- Group for laparoscopic resection of GIST with unfavorable group (Unfavorable group)
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Laparoscopic resection
- label
- Group B (Control group)
- description
- Group for laparoscopic resection of GIST with favorable group (favorable group)
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Laparoscopic resection
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- 3-year disease free survival rate
- timeFrame
- 36 months
- description
- Definition of recurrence and recurrence date The following situations are regarded as "recurrence" 1. Recurrence identified by any one image examination (X-ray, ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, etc.) and, if there are a variety of imaging examinations, results without contradiction determined "recurrence". The earliest date that the recurrence is found is defined as the "recurrence date". 2. For cases that lack the use of imaging or a pathological diagnosis, the date of diagnosing the occurrence of clinical recurrence based on clinical history and physical examination is defined as the "recurrence date". 3. For cases without imaging or clinical diagnosis but with a cytology or tissue biopsy pathological diagnosis of recurrence, the earliest date confirmed by cytology or biopsy pathology is considered the "recurrence date". 4. A rise in carcinoembryonic antigen or other associated tumor markers alone could not be diagnosed as a relapse.
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 75 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age between 18 and 75 years old 2. Primary gastric lesion confirmed pathologically GIST by endoscopic biopsy. Preoperative endoscopy, ultrasound endoscopy or computer tomography, Magnetic resonance suspected GIST, and then postoperative pathology confirmed as the original GIST 3. Written informed consent 4. Expected R0 resection by laparoscopy 5. Performance status of 0 or 1 on the ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) scale 6. ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) class I to III 7. Maximum tumor diameter ≤10cm Exclusion Criteria: 1. Pregnant and lactating women 2. Suffering from a severe mental disorder 3. History of previous upper abdominal surgery (except for laparoscopic cholecystectomy) 4. History of previous gastric surgery (including ESD/EMR for gastric cancer) 5. Rejection of laparoscopic resection 6. History of other malignant disease within the past five years 7. History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the past six months 8. History of a cerebrovascular accident within the past six months 9. History of continuous systematic administration of corticosteroids within one month 10. Requirement of simultaneous surgery for another disease 11. Emergency surgery due to complications (bleeding, obstruction or perforation) caused by gastric cancer 12. FEV1\<50% of the predicted values 13. Maximum tumor diameter \>10cm
References
Publications (18)
- BACKGROUNDPidhorecky I, Cheney RT, Kraybill WG, Gibbs JF. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: current diagnosis, biologic behavior, and management. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000 Oct;7(9):705-12. doi: 10.1007/s10434-000-0705-6. PMID 11034250
- BACKGROUNDDemetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR, DeMatteo RP, Ganjoo KN, Maki RG, Pisters PW, Raut CP, Riedel RF, Schuetze S, Sundar HM, Trent JC, Wayne JD. NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 Apr;8 Suppl 2(0 2):S1-41; quiz S42-4. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0116. PMID 20457867
- BACKGROUNDMiettinen M, Majidi M, Lasota J. Pathology and diagnostic criteria of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a review. Eur J Cancer. 2002 Sep;38 Suppl 5:S39-51. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)80602-5. PMID 12528772
- BACKGROUNDKarakousis GC, Singer S, Zheng J, Gonen M, Coit D, DeMatteo RP, Strong VE. Laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a size-matched comparison. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jun;18(6):1599-605. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1517-y. Epub 2011 Jan 5. PMID 21207158
- BACKGROUNDMelstrom LG, Phillips JD, Bentrem DJ, Wayne JD. Laparoscopic versus open resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct;35(5):451-4. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31821954a7. PMID 21552096
- BACKGROUNDKoh YX, Chok AY, Zheng HL, Tan CS, Chow PK, Wong WK, Goh BK. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(11):3549-60. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3051-1. Epub 2013 Jun 21. PMID 23793362
- BACKGROUNDGanai S, Prachand VN, Posner MC, Alverdy JC, Choi E, Hussain M, Waxman I, Patti MG, Roggin KK. Predictors of unsuccessful laparoscopic resection of gastric submucosal neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Feb;17(2):244-55; discussion 255-6. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2095-z. Epub 2012 Dec 8.