Clinical trial · Interventional
A Study of SHR-1210 Plus Apatinib in Patients With Soft Tissue Sarcoma
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open, Phase 2 Trial of SHR-1210 Plus Apatinib Versus Doxorubicin (ADM) Plus Ifosfamide (IFO) in Patients With Soft Tissue Sarcoma
NCT03711279CI-TRIAL-00074565terminatedPhase 2Results postedClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Why stopped (as posted): Sponsor R \& D Strategy Adjustment
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of SHR-1210 plus Apatinib versus AMD plus IFO in participants with soft tissue sarcoma.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sarcoma | Sarcoma | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADM plus IFO or IFO alone | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
| SHR-1210 plus Apatinib | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- SHR-1210 plus Apatinib
- interventionNames
- Drug: SHR-1210 plus Apatinib
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- ADM plus IFO or IFO alone
- interventionNames
- Drug: ADM plus IFO or IFO alone
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Progression Free Survival (PFS)
- timeFrame
- From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 31 months, CT was conducted at baseline、weeks 7、13、19 and then every 12 weeks.
- description
- Randomization to Radiographic Progression or Death Due to Any Cause (Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 16 Years
- Maximum age
- 70 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Male or female subjects with the age from 16 years to 70 years. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1;the ECOG performance status of 2 can be accepted after the amputation. * Life expectancy of at least 3 months. * Histologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced unresectable or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma not amenable to curative treatment with surgery or radiotherapy.The histopathologic types as specified in the protocol. * Without prior systemic chemotherapy or relapse more than 6 months after the completion of last systemic chemotherapy. * Presence of measurable disease as defined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1). * Acceptable liver function, renal function, hematologic status and coagulation function as specified in the protocol. * Females of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days prior to randomization.Females of child-bearing potential and males must agree to use highly effective contraceptive precautions during the trial and up to 3 months following the last dose of study drug. * Willingness to comply with the study protocol for any reason. Exclusion Criteria: * Receiving any previous anticancer treatment, other investigational drugs or any attenuated live vaccine with 4 weeks of the first does of study drug. * Prior treatment with PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 targeted drugs or VEGFR targeted drugs. * Plan to receive surgery or radiotherapy to treat the sarcoma during the trail. * Radiological evidence of brain metastases or primary tumors. * Diagnosed other malignancies within the last 3 years from the first dose of drug. * Known allergy to any of the treatment components. * Active infection including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) ,HBV or HCV. * Concomitant disease or condition that could interfere with the conduct of the study, or that would, in the opinion of the investigator, pose an unacceptable risk to the subject in this study.
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available
No reference posted for this study.