Clinical trial · Observational

Trends and Outcomes in Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer

Trends and Outcomes in Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer From 2005 to 2016 Using the ACS-NSQIP Database, a Retrospective Cohort Study

NCT03683446CI-TRIAL-00035008NSQIPccompletedClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsPublishedExplore in graph →

Summary

Brief summary (as posted)

Retrospective cohort study used to analyze trends in minimally invasive versus open surgery in colorectal surgery, over time, in outcome in the laparoscopic, robotic and open surgery groups in patients receiving colorectal resections. Analysis will be performed using data collected through the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database, a national database with deidentified data entered by trained nurse data reviewers.

Conditions

Conditions (2)

Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.

Condition (as posted)	Mapped entity	Match	Confidence
Colorectal Adenocarcinoma	Colorectal Adenocarcinoma	ONTOLOGY_EXACT	0.98
Colorectal Surgery	—	UNRESOLVED	—

Interventions

Interventions (2)

Intervention	Type	Mapped drug	Match
Laparoscopic rectal surgery	Procedure	—	UNRESOLVED
Open rectal surgery	Procedure	—	UNRESOLVED

Design

Arms and outcomes

Arms (2)

label
Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery
description
A minimally invasive surgery and specialized technique for performing surgery using smaller incisions (or ports) to enter into the abdomen or anus for a tubular instrument(trochar), and a special camera (laparoscope), which is passed through the trochars to visualize the colon. For abdominal entry, at the beginning of the procedure, the abdomen is inflated with carbon dioxide gas to provide a working and viewing space for the surgeon. For both, the laparoscope transmits images from the abdominal cavity or anus to high-resolution video monitors to allow the surgeon detailed images of the abdomen on the monitor.
interventionNames
1. Procedure: Laparoscopic rectal surgery
label
Open Rectal Surgery
description
Surgery performed through a single long incision (cut) in the abdomen (belly) to access the colon and/or the rectum.
interventionNames
1. Procedure: Open rectal surgery

Primary outcomes (1)

measure

Eligibility

Eligibility (as posted)

Sex: All
Minimum age: 18 Years

Show eligibility criteria text

Inclusion Criteria:

* Primary diagnosis of Rectal Cancer

Exclusion Criteria:

* Emergency Surgery

References

Publications (8)

BACKGROUNDFleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George V, Abbas M, Peters WR Jr, Maun D, Chang G, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch M, Wexner S, Whiteford M, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin D, Larson D, Marcello P, Posner M, Read T, Monson J, Wren SM, Pisters PW, Nelson H. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1346-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10529. PMID 26441179
BACKGROUNDStevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ, Davies L, Wilson K, Hague W, Simes J; ALaCaRT Investigators. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1356-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12009. PMID 26441180
BACKGROUNDBonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Haglind E; COLOR II Study Group. A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):194. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1505367. No abstract available. PMID 26154803
BACKGROUNDJeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang SB, Lim SB, Choi HS, Kim DW, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Jung KH, Kim TY, Kang GH, Chie EK, Kim SY, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Kim JS, Lee HS, Kim JH, Oh JH. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):767-74. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70205-0. Epub 2014 May 15. PMID 24837215
BACKGROUNDGreenblatt DY, Rajamanickam V, Pugely AJ, Heise CP, Foley EF, Kennedy GD. Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for rectal cancer: results from the ACS NSQIP. J Am Coll Surg. 2011 May;212(5):844-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Mar 16. PMID 21414814
BACKGROUNDJiang JB, Jiang K, Dai Y, Wang RX, Wu WZ, Wang JJ, Xie FB, Li XM. Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Aug;19(8):1497-512. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2857-5. Epub 2015 Jun 4.