Clinical trial · Observational
Evaluation of Pain and Postoperative Nausea Vomiting Incidence in Outpatient Surgery at IUCT-Oncopole Hospital
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The effectiveness of the analgesic and anti-nausea prevention techniques of the investigators justifies being evaluated regularly in order to adapt the management strategy to the specificities of each surgical act. A first evaluation took place in June 2016 and allowed to identify a category of patients (partial breast surgery with or without axillary gesture) not benefiting from an ideal algological management because justifying in 30% of the cases of a level 3 analgesic remedy in the postoperative recovery room. This use of morphine results in a significant incidence of postoperative nausea and prolonged recovery time before return home harmful to the patient. With their experience in locoregional anesthesia technique in complete breast surgery (total mastectomy) and aware of the effectiveness of this type of anesthesia on the management of immediate and chronic pain, the investigators have extended their indications of ALR to partial breast surgery in ambulatory.
Conditions
Conditions (3)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anesthesia | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Cancer | Malignant Neoplasm | ALIAS | 0.90 |
| Surgery | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| locoregional anesthesia | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- label
- Group 1
- description
- patients of 2016, June with locoregional anesthesia
- interventionNames
- Procedure: locoregional anesthesia
- label
- Group 2
- description
- patients of 2018, June with locoregional anesthesia
- interventionNames
- Procedure: locoregional anesthesia
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Evaluation of pain after surgery by Simple Verbal Evaluation
- timeFrame
- 1 day (the day of the surgery)
- description
- Pain level in post-operative room measured by Simple Verbal Evaluation. The simple verbal scale or Keele scale has 5 qualifiers to describe the intensity of the pain, each descriptor is associated with a numerical value. 0 = no pain, 1 = poor, 2 = moderate, 3 = intense, 4 = atrocious. The goal of management is to achieve pain values below 3 (low to moderate).
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * patients admitted for ambulatory surgery under general anesthesia * patients admitted during the period from 01 to 30 June 2016 or during the period from 18 to 5 July 2018 Exclusion Criteria: * Patient neither French nor English, * Patient refusing to participate in this study * Minor patients were excluded to ensure the homogeneity of the surveyed population (satisfaction of minors not meeting the same characteristics as that of adults)
References
Publications (5)
- RESULTGartner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, Ewertz M, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):1985-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1568. PMID 19903919
- RESULTFuzier R, Puel F, Izard P, Sommet A, Pierre S. Prospective cohort study assessing chronic pain in patients following minor surgery for breast cancer. J Anesth. 2017 Apr;31(2):246-254. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2288-9. Epub 2016 Nov 24. PMID 27885426
- RESULTBlanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): a novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Nov;59(9):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 29. PMID 22939099
- RESULTBouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle J, Cunin G, Fermanian J, Ginies P, Grun-Overdyking A, Jafari-Schluep H, Lanteri-Minet M, Laurent B, Mick G, Serrie A, Valade D, Vicaut E. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain. 2005 Mar;114(1-2):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.010. Epub 2005 Jan 26. PMID 15733628
- RESULTKumar SP. Utilization of brief pain inventory as an assessment tool for pain in patients with cancer: a focused review. Indian J Palliat Care. 2011 May;17(2):108-15. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.84531. PMID 21976850