Clinical trial · Observational
ERANet-LAC CODE: International Care Of the Dying Evaluation
International Care Of the Dying Evaluation (CODE): Quality of Care for Cancer Patients as Perceived by Bereaved Relatives
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 12, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260912-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Providing high quality care for dying patients and their families is very important. One way one can assess the care provided is to ask bereaved relatives to complete a questionnaire after their family member has died. The questionnaire can ask about their experiences and their thoughts about the care provided to their family member. One such questionnaire is the 'Care Of the Dying Evaluation' (or CODE). CODE has been developed with the help and support of bereaved relatives and has been used extensively within the United Kingdom. In this project the investigators want to use the CODE questionnaire to look at bereaved relatives' views about care provided in seven different countries within Europe and Latin America. In the first part of the project CODE was translated into the main language of each country. Volunteers and bereaved relatives in each country were asked to give feedback about whether CODE was easy to understand, sensitive, and easy to complete. Based on the feedback a common version of CODE that is suitable for use across all the countries was developed. In the next phase of the project, relatives who have recently experienced a bereavement where one of their family members has died from cancer in a hospital, will be invited to complete the CODE questionnaire about two months after the patient's death. The relatives may complete CODE on paper, using a computer, or by interview. The aim is to have 100 completed CODE questionnaires from each of the seven countries. The data from the questionnaires will be used to make a report on the current quality of care for dying cancer patients in hospitals across the seven countries. It will also be possible to compare the care between the countries and identify areas needing improvement. In the next phase of the project, health care professionals, researchers and bereaved relatives together will use their knowledge and experience to find effective ways to improve the weak areas identified, and assess the results of putting these changes into practice.
Conditions
Conditions (3)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bereavement | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Neoplasms | Neoplasm | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.90 |
| Quality of Life | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (0)
Data not yet available
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- label
- Bereaved relatives
- description
- Bereaved relatives after cancer deaths in hospitals
Primary outcomes (2)
- measure
- CODE (Care Of the Dying Evaluation) Questionnaire Item 30 Score for Relatives' Perception of How Much of the Time the Deceased Patient Was Treated With Dignity and Respect, by Nurses, and by Doctors
- timeFrame
- 6-8 weeks post bereavement
- description
- CODE (Care Of the Dying Evaluation) questionnaire, item 30: How much of the time was the deceased patient treated with dignity and respect, by nurses, and by doctors. Maximum obtainable score 4, minimum 0. The higher score, the better outcome.
- measure
- Number of Participants (Relatives) Answering "Yes" to CODE (Care Of the Dying Evaluation) Questionnaire Item 31: Were You Adequately Supported in the Patients' Last Days of Life?
- timeFrame
- 6-8 weeks post bereavement
- description
- CODE (Care Of the Dying Evaluation) questionnaire, item 31: Were you adequately supported in the patient's last days of life? Yes/no question. The higher percentage of relatives answering 'yes', the better outcome.
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Next-of-kin to a patient who died an 'expected' death from cancer in hospital * Has been present at the hospital together with the patient at least some of the time during the patient's last two days. (This might not always be known or recorded, therefore the participant may have the option to pass the questionnaire on to somebody better placed to complete it.) * Patient was ≥ 18 years of age at the time of Death * Patient had been admitted to the hospital (not any specific ward) at least three calendar days (e.g., admission August 1st, died August 3rd) * Able to give written informed consent, which might be implied when the participant completes and returns the questionnaire, in keeping with the ethical stipulations for each country Exclusion Criteria: * Patient had a sudden and unexpected death * Unable to complete the questionnaire due to language abilities or reduced cognitive functioning (in some countries the offer of a translator would be provided if someone wanted to complete the questionnaire but had difficulty due to languages)
References
Publications (29)
- BACKGROUNDThe 2015 Quality of Death index. Ranking palliative care across the world. The Economist Intelligence Unit. A report by The Economist Intelligence Unit. Lien Foundation 2015.
- BACKGROUNDPastrana T, De Lima L, Wenk R, et al. Atlas de Cuidados Paliativos de Latinoamérica. Houston,TX: IAHPC Press, 2012.
- BACKGROUNDPastrana T, Eisenchlas J, Centeno C, De Lima L. Status of palliative care in Latin America: looking through the Latin America Atlas of Palliative Care. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2013 Dec;7(4):411-6. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000008. PMID 24145682
- BACKGROUNDNational care of the dying audit for hospitals, England. National report, Royal College of Physicians, May 2014
- BACKGROUNDThe International Collaborative for Best Care for the Dying Person. Supporting Care in the Last Hours or Days of Life. May 2014.
- BACKGROUNDDepartment of Health (2008). End of life care strategy. Promoting high quality care for all adults at the end of life. Department of Health: London.
- BACKGROUNDBurge F, Lawson B, Johnston G, Asada Y, McIntyre PF, Grunfeld E, Flowerdew G. Bereaved family member perceptions of patient-focused family-centred care during the last 30 days of life using a mortality follow-back survey: does location matter? BMC Palliat Care. 2014 May 14;13:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-25. eCollection 2014. PMID 24855451
- BACKGROUNDOffice of National Statistics (2014). National Survey of Bereaved People (VOICES) 2014. Office of National Statistics.
- BACKGROUNDvan der Heide A, de Vogel-Voogt E, Visser AP, van der Rijt CC, van der Maas PJ. Dying at home or in an institution: perspectives of Dutch physicians and bereaved relatives. Support Care Cancer. 2007 Dec;15(12):1413-21. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0254-7. Epub 2007 Apr 20. PMID 17447086
- Mayland CR, Williams EM, Ellershaw JE. Assessing quality of care for the dying: the development and initial validation of a postal self-completion questionnaire for bereaved relatives. Palliat Med. 2012 Oct;26(7):897-907. doi: 10.1177/0269216311424953. Epub 2011 Nov 1.