Clinical trial · Interventional
Nedaplatin Versus Cisplatin and Capecitabine Versus Fluorouracil in IC + CCRT for Locoregionally Advanced NPC
Nedaplatin Versus Cisplatin and Capecitabine Versus Fluorouracil in Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locoregionally Advanced NPC: a Phase 3, Multicentre, Non-inferiority, Randomised Factorial Trial
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
This is a phase 3, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised factorial trial. The purpose of this study is to study the efficacy and safety of nedaplatin versus cisplatin, and capecitabine versus fluorouracil in induction docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF) plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin (P-RT) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma | Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
Interventions
Interventions (6)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| cisplatin | Drug | Cisplatin | ALIAS |
| docetaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
| docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
| docetaxel, nedaplatin, and capecitabine | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
| docetaxel, nedaplatin, and fluorouracil | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
| nedaplatin | Drug | Nedaplatin | ALIAS |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (4)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- A (TPF+P-RT)
- description
- Induction docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin
- interventionNames
- Drug: docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil
- Drug: cisplatin
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- B (TNF+N-RT)
- description
- Induction docetaxel, nedaplatin, and fluorouracil plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin
- interventionNames
- Drug: nedaplatin
- Drug: docetaxel, nedaplatin, and fluorouracil
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- C (TPX+P-RT)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 60 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18-60 * Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing (according to World Health Organization (WHO) histologically type) * Performance status of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) grade 0 or 1 * Tumor staged as American Joint Committee on Cance (AJCC) III-IVA (except T3-4N0) * Adequate marrow: leucocyte count ≥ 4×10\^9/L, hemoglobin ≥ 90g/L and platelet count ≥ 100×10\^9/L. * Normal liver and renal function test: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) ≤ 1.5×upper limit of normal (ULN) concomitant with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 2.5×ULN, and bilirubin ≤ ULN; creatinine clearance ≥ 60 ml/min. * Patients must be informed of the investigational nature of this study and give written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * WHO Type keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma or basaloid squamous cell carcinoma. * Prior malignancy except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer. * Pregnancy or lactation (consider pregnancy test in women of child-bearing age and emphasize effective contraception during the treatment period). * History of previous RT (except for non-melanomatous skin cancers outside intended RT treatment volume). * Prior chemotherapy or surgery (except diagnostic) to primary tumor or nodes. * Any severe intercurrent disease, which may bring unacceptable risk or affect the compliance of the trial, for example, unstable cardiac disease requiring treatment, renal disease, chronic hepatitis, diabetes with poor control (fasting plasma glucose \> 1.5×ULN), and emotional disturbance. * Patients who could not tolerate or allergic to capecitabine. * Illness that would interfere with oral medication, including dysphagia, chronic diarrhea, or ileus.
References
Publications (9)
- BACKGROUNDLai SZ, Li WF, Chen L, Luo W, Chen YY, Liu LZ, Sun Y, Lin AH, Liu MZ, Ma J. How does intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy influence the treatment results in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jul 1;80(3):661-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.024. Epub 2010 Jul 17. PMID 20643517
- BACKGROUNDLi WF, Sun Y, Mao YP, Chen L, Chen YY, Chen M, Liu LZ, Lin AH, Li L, Ma J. Proposed lymph node staging system using the International Consensus Guidelines for lymph node levels is predictive for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from endemic areas treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jun 1;86(2):249-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Nov 29. PMID 23200171
- BACKGROUNDSun Y, Li WF, Chen NY, Zhang N, Hu GQ, Xie FY, Sun Y, Chen XZ, Li JG, Zhu XD, Hu CS, Xu XY, Chen YY, Hu WH, Guo L, Mo HY, Chen L, Mao YP, Sun R, Ai P, Liang SB, Long GX, Zheng BM, Feng XL, Gong XC, Li L, Shen CY, Xu JY, Guo Y, Chen YM, Zhang F, Lin L, Tang LL, Liu MZ, Ma J. Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):1509-1520. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30410-7. Epub 2016 Sep 27. PMID 27686945
- BACKGROUNDTang LQ, Chen DP, Guo L, Mo HY, Huang Y, Guo SS, Qi B, Tang QN, Wang P, Li XY, Li JB, Liu Q, Gao YH, Xie FY, Liu LT, Li Y, Liu SL, Xie HJ, Liang YJ, Sun XS, Yan JJ, Wu YS, Luo DH, Huang PY, Xiang YQ, Sun R, Chen MY, Lv X, Wang L, Xia WX, Zhao C, Cao KJ, Qian CN, Guo X, Hong MH, Nie ZQ, Chen QY, Mai HQ. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin versus cisplatin in stage II-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):461-473. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30104-9. Epub 2018 Feb 28. PMID 29501366
- BACKGROUNDSasaki Y, Tamura T, Eguchi K, Shinkai T, Fujiwara Y, Fukuda M, Ohe Y, Bungo M, Horichi N, Niimi S, et al. Pharmacokinetics of (glycolate-0,0')-diammine platinum (II), a new platinum derivative, in comparison with cisplatin and carboplatin. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1989;23(4):243-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00451649.