Clinical trial · Interventional
Comparison of Low and High Ligation With Apical Lymph Node Dissection in the Laparoscopy Rectal Cancer
Preservation of the Left Colic Artery With Apical Lymph Node Dissection in Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The purpose of this study is to explore the different impacts of high and low ligation in laparoscopic rectal interior resection on postoperative anastomotic leakage and proximal bowel necrosis and stenosis, as well as the quality of life and long-term survival. In the anterior resection of rectum, the section level of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is still a controversial subject between the advocates of high and low ligation. The low ligation is defined as the IMA is ligated below the origin of the left colic artery while the high ligation refers to the IMA is ligated at its origin from the aorta. Nowadays the spread of laparoscopy has encouraged more frequent execution of the high ligation, which appears easier to achieve than the low ligation and also with the advantage of lower anastomosis traction but with the disadvantage of worse vascularization of the stumps as well.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rectal Cancer | Malignant Rectal Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| High ligation | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Low ligation | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Low ligation
- description
- Left colic artery (LCA) is identified, tie the sigmoid artery and superior rectal artery,Apical lymph node dissection with the left colic artery preservation is performed.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Low ligation
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- High ligation
- description
- The IMA is ligated and divided at 2 cm from its origin. Apical lymph nodes dissection is performed.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: High ligation
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Anastomotic leakage
- timeFrame
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 75 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * 18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Senior). * Colonoscopy and pathology shows rectal or sigmoid adenocarcinoma. * Tumor located at 4-15 cm from the dentate line. * The clinical staging of tumor by MRI within T1-4a when tumor Above the peritoneum and T3N0-2 when tumor below the peritoneum. * Receive or not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil before surgery and radical resection is available after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. * Anus-saving operation is available. * ASA class: I-III. * Well tolerate to general anesthesia. * ECOG score: 0-1. * Patients - can understand and are willing to take part in the clinical trial. Exclusion Criteria: * Severe cardiovascular disease, uncontrollable infection or other severe complications. * Severe mental illness. * Suffer with other carcinoma simultaneously or sequentially in 5 years. * Familial polyposis coli or Multiple -colorectal tumor. * History of abdominal surgery and with severe abdominal adhesions. * Combine with acute intestinal obstruction, intestinal bleeding, intestinal perforation and emergency surgery is needed. * Multiple organs resection surgery is needed. * Abdominoperineal resection need to be performed. * ASA class: IV to V. * Pregnant, suckling period or reject to birth control. * Patient who unable to go through the clinical trial because of familial,social or religious factors. * Refuse to take part in the trial. * Patients without an informed consent. * Non-compliant patient * The patient or their family members want to withdraw from the clinical trial. * Loss to follow-up * Researchers think the participants need to withdraw from the clinical trial.
References
Publications (21)
- BACKGROUNDMilnerowicz S, Milnerowicz A, Tabola R. A middle mesenteric artery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012 Dec;34(10):973-5. doi: 10.1007/s00276-012-0987-y. Epub 2012 Jul 22. PMID 22820922
- BACKGROUNDCharlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. PMID 3558716
- BACKGROUNDKim DI, Han SH. A rare branching pattern of hindgut: absence of inferior mesenteric artery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2017 Jul;39(7):803-806. doi: 10.1007/s00276-016-1770-2. Epub 2016 Dec 20. PMID 27999945
- BACKGROUNDVermeer TA, Orsini RG, Daams F, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Rutten HJ. Anastomotic leakage and presacral abscess formation after locally advanced rectal cancer surgery: Incidence, risk factors and treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;40(11):1502-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.019. Epub 2014 Apr 4. PMID 24745995
- BACKGROUNDAbe T, Ujiie A, Taguchi Y, Satoh S, Shibuya T, Jun Y, Isogai S, Satoh YI. Anomalous inferior mesenteric artery supplying the ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colons. Anat Sci Int. 2018 Jan;93(1):144-148. doi: 10.1007/s12565-017-0401-2. Epub 2017 Apr 6. PMID 28386743
- BACKGROUNDRahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Buchler MW. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery. 2010 Mar;147(3):339-51. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012. Epub 2009 Dec 11. PMID 20004450
- BACKGROUNDSmedh K, Sverrisson I, Chabok A, Nikberg M; HAPIrect Collaborative Study Group. Hartmann's procedure vs abdominoperineal resection with intersphincteric dissection in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized multicentre trial (HAPIrect). BMC Surg. 2016 Jul 11;16(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0161-2.