Clinical trial · Interventional
Feasibility Study of Interval Compressed Regimen Using Four-drugs for Osteosarcoma
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The aim of the study is to test the feasibility of four-drug, interval-compressed regimen in osteosarcoma. Primary objective is to explore the toxicity and mortality related to treatment. Secondary objectives are to examine tumor necrosis rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and to evaluate the usefulness of circulating cell-free DNA, survivin, or transforming growth factor-beta1 levels as well as programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in tumor specimen as a predictive or prognostic biomarker in osteosarcoma patients.
Conditions
Conditions (4)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biomarker | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Feasibility | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Osteosarcoma | Osteosarcoma | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.90 |
| Treatment Response | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good responder group adjuvant chemotherapy | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Poor responder group adjuvant chemotherapy | Drug | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- four-drug interval-compressed regimen
- description
- Interventions for 'four-drug interval-compressed regimen': Drug: methotrexate, cisplatin, doxorubicin, ifosfamide. Newly diagnosed oseteosarcoma patients under 40 years are eligible. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with four drugs in an interval-compressed schedule will be done as a single arm. Duration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be 10 weeks like that of conventional three-drug regimen, although four-drugs are employed in the current protocol. After tumor resection operation, participants will be divided to poor responder group and good responder group based on 90% necrosis rate of a tumor specimen. Poor responder group and will be assigned to 'Poor responder group adjuvant chemotherapy' and good responder will be assigned to 'Good responder group adjuvant chemotherapy'.
- interventionNames
- Drug: Poor responder group adjuvant chemotherapy
- Drug: Good responder group adjuvant chemotherapy
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Toxicity determined according to CTCAE
- timeFrame
- Until study completion, an average of 3 years
- description
- treatment-related toxicity (organ dysfunction, neutropenic fever, infection, mortality, et al.)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Maximum age
- 40 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Newly diagnosed osteosarcoma patients under age 40 years. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who don't meet the organ function criteria as follows; 1. renal function : CCr or GFR or eGFR ≥ 70 mL/min/1.73 m2 2. liver function : AST/ALT ≤ 5 x upper limit, total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal for age 3. cardiac function : shortening fraction ≥ 24% or ejection fraction ≥ 50% (Echo) 4. lung function : No dyspnea on rest, If dyspnea exists, SpO2 95% or more in room air by pulse oximetry, 5. hematologic : ANC ≥ 750/uL and platelet ≥ 75,000/uL
References
Publications (2)
- BACKGROUNDLewis IJ, Nooij MA, Whelan J, Sydes MR, Grimer R, Hogendoorn PC, Memon MA, Weeden S, Uscinska BM, van Glabbeke M, Kirkpatrick A, Hauben EI, Craft AW, Taminiau AH; MRC BO06 and EORTC 80931 collaborators; European Osteosarcoma Intergroup. Improvement in histologic response but not survival in osteosarcoma patients treated with intensified chemotherapy: a randomized phase III trial of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Jan 17;99(2):112-28. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk015. PMID 17227995
- BACKGROUNDMarina NM, Smeland S, Bielack SS, Bernstein M, Jovic G, Krailo MD, Hook JM, Arndt C, van den Berg H, Brennan B, Brichard B, Brown KLB, Butterfass-Bahloul T, Calaminus G, Daldrup-Link HE, Eriksson M, Gebhardt MC, Gelderblom H, Gerss J, Goldsby R, Goorin A, Gorlick R, Grier HE, Hale JP, Hall KS, Hardes J, Hawkins DS, Helmke K, Hogendoorn PCW, Isakoff MS, Janeway KA, Jurgens H, Kager L, Kuhne T, Lau CC, Leavey PJ, Lessnick SL, Mascarenhas L, Meyers PA, Mottl H, Nathrath M, Papai Z, Randall RL, Reichardt P, Renard M, Safwat AA, Schwartz CL, Stevens MCG, Strauss SJ, Teot L, Werner M, Sydes MR, Whelan JS. Comparison of MAPIE versus MAP in patients with a poor response to preoperative chemotherapy for newly diagnosed high-grade osteosarcoma (EURAMOS-1): an open-label, international, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Oct;17(10):1396-1408. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30214-5. Epub 2016 Aug 25. PMID 27569442