Clinical trial · Interventional
Circulating Cell-free DNA-based Epigenetic Biomarker mSEPT9 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection in Cirrhosis
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Circulating Cell-free DNA-based Epigenetic Biomarker mSEPT9 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection Among Cirrhotic Patients: the SEPT9_CROSS Study
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Brief Summary (Plain-Language Version - Compliant with ClinicalTrials.gov Guidelines) The goal of this observational study is to learn whether a blood test called methylated SEPT9 (mSEPT9) can help diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type of liver cancer, in people who already have cirrhosis. The study also compares how well this new test works compared with the current standard blood test called alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). The main questions the study aims to answer are: 1. Can the mSEPT9 blood test detect liver cancer earlier or more accurately than AFP in people with cirrhosis? 2. Does combining both tests (AFP and mSEPT9) improve the accuracy of diagnosis? The study, called SEPT9-CROSS, is a phase III, multicenter, cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. It includes 639 adults with cirrhosis who were enrolled across participating hospitals in France. After reviewing eligibility and exclusion criteria, 574 participants were included in the final analysis: 118 people with liver cancer and 456 people with cirrhosis but no liver cancer. The main outcome (primary outcome) is the presence of liver cancer at the time of study enrollment, confirmed by imaging or biopsy based on international medical guidelines. An exploratory outcome looks at participants who developed liver cancer within 12 months after joining the study. This second measure helps researchers understand whether the test can identify early or hidden disease. All participants gave written informed consent before joining the study. As part of their regular medical care, participants received clinical exams, blood tests, and imaging studies (such as ultrasound). During routine blood draws, an extra 20 milliliters of blood (about 4 teaspoons) was collected for the mSEPT9 test. These blood samples were processed and safely stored at the CRB Lorrain biobank at the University Hospital of Nancy, France, for later analysis. The study compares the performance of AFP and mSEPT9 individually and in combination. Two diagnostic strategies were tested: * Tier 1 (high sensitivity): A positive result if either AFP or mSEPT9 was high. * Tier 2 (high specificity): A positive result only if both AFP and mSEPT9 were high. Researchers used statistical models to measure how well the tests identified cancer. This included estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values (how likely a result is to be correct). These calculations were repeated 10,000 times using computer simulations to ensure reliability. Advanced Bayesian statistical models were also used to confirm the stability and strength of the results and to compare the performance of mSEPT9 and AFP. A risk model (called a nomogram) was created to estimate each participant's probability of having liver cancer based on their test results. All analyses were planned before the study started and carried out using the software R (version 4.3.0) and Python (PyCharm environment) with validated scripts to ensure accuracy and reproducibility.
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cirrhosis | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Hepatocellular Carcinoma | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| "Epi proColon 2.0 CE" test from Epigenomics, Inc (Berlin, Germany) | Diagnostic Test | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- HCC-free cirrhotic patients (Controls)
- description
- Patients with cirrhosis without evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were enrolled as part of an established HCC surveillance program involving abdominal ultrasonography and alpha-fetoprotein measurement every six months in the participating centers. Each participant underwent testing with the plasma methylated SEPT9 (mSEPT9) assay (Epi proColon 2.0 CE; Epigenomics, Berlin, Germany).
- interventionNames
- Diagnostic Test: "Epi proColon 2.0 CE" test from Epigenomics, Inc (Berlin, Germany)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- HCC-positive cirrhotic patients (Cases)
- description
- Patients with cirrhosis and a diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma established according to the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines were enrolled at the participating centers. Each participant underwent testing with the plasma methylated SEPT9 (mSEPT9) assay (Epi proColon 2.0 CE; Epigenomics, Berlin, Germany).
- interventionNames
- Diagnostic Test: "Epi proColon 2.0 CE" test from Epigenomics, Inc (Berlin, Germany)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
INCLUSION CRITERIA * Patient aged 18 and over. * Patient with a diagnosis of cirrhosis (alcohol, HBV, HBC, NASH, hemochromatosis, autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis) with or without hepatocellular carcinoma (for each arm). * Affiliation to the French Social Security System (Health Insurance) NON-INCLUSION CRITERIA FOR CASES : * Malignant liver tumor other than HCC: cholangiocarcinoma, hepatic metastasis of a carcinoma (e.g., colorectal adenocarcinoma); * History of HCC treated by surgical resection, focal destruction \[radiofrequency, stereotactic radiotherapy (CYBERKNIFE®)\], arterial chemoembolization, or radioembolization within the last five years. NON-INCLUSION CRITERIA FOR CASES AND CONTROLS: * Legal protection measures; * Pregnant woman; * Hemodialysis, ongoing (possibility of interference with the test); * Presence of associated cancer (e.g., colorectal adenocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, breast carcinoma, etc.) since less than five years; * Presence of a hematological malignancy (no time limit).
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available