Clinical trial · Observational
Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients With Head and Neck Pathology
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Patients who undergo general anesthesia for surgical procedures frequently need to have a breathing tube placed ("tracheal intubation") for the duration of the procedure. Most often airway management is routine for an experienced anesthesiologist. Less often, airway management can be difficult and can result in patient harm. In order to reduce risk, anesthesiologists routinely evaluate patients' airways by obtaining a relevant history and doing a physical exam, which can aid in predicting which airways may be difficult to manage. The "gold standard" for management of the anticipated difficult airway is to perform an awake flexible bronchoscopic intubation after anesthetizing the airway with local anesthesia. This affords added safety because the airway remains patent and the patient breaths spontaneously until a tracheal tube is secured, at which point general anesthesia can be induced. Recently, authors have advocated for alternative methods of management of the predicted difficult airway, most commonly by using a video laryngoscope to perform the awake intubation. A video laryngoscope provides an indirect view of the larynx using a camera at the tip of a rigid laryngoscope. It takes less training to gain and maintain proficiency compared to flexible bronchoscopy. Previous studies that have shown successful awake intubation with video laryngoscopy in the predicted difficult airway have not included patients with head and neck pathology, including malignancies or a history of head and neck surgery or radiation. In this study, the study team will perform video laryngoscopy in patients with head and neck pathology who require awake bronchoscopic intubation for surgery after placement of the tracheal tube and induction of anesthesia. The study team hypothesize that it will be difficult to obtain a good view of the larynx with video laryngoscopy in some patients with head and neck pathology. If there is a significant incidence of difficult video laryngoscopy in this patient population, it will reinforce that anesthesiologists need to continue to learn and maintain skills in bronchoscopic intubation.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Difficult Intubation | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indirect Laryngoscopy | Device | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- label
- Indirect laryngoscopy
- description
- Head and neck pathology patients undergoing indirect laryngoscopy. Patients with a past medical history of active or previously treated head and neck pathology.
- interventionNames
- Device: Indirect Laryngoscopy
Primary outcomes (2)
- measure
- Number of Participants With Cormack-Lehane Grade >2 Obtained With CMAC D Blade
- timeFrame
- Day 1
- description
- Number of participants with difficult (Cormack-Lehane grade \>2) video laryngoscopic view of the larynx after awake flexible bronchoscopic intubation in patients with head and neck pathology with CMAC Cormack-Lehane grade in patients with head and neck pathology of the larynx. Cormack-Lehane grade: Grade 1: full view of the glottis Grade 2a: partial view of the glottis Grade 2b: arytenoids only Grade 3: epiglottis only Grade 4: neither glottis or epiglottis identified
- measure
- Number of Participants With Cormack-Lehane Grade >2 Obtained With Glidescope AVL
- timeFrame
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Age\> 18 years old * Presence of oral, pharyngeal or laryngeal mass or history of surgery or radiation for head and neck cancer * Requiring awake flexible bronchoscopic intubation for surgery * Willing and able to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Emergency Procedure * Presence of one or more loose teeth
References
Publications (8)
- BACKGROUNDApfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Benumof JL, Berry FA, Blitt CD, Bode RH, Cheney FW, Connis RT, Guidry OF, Nickinovich DG, Ovassapian A; American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):251-70. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827773b2. No abstract available. PMID 23364566
- BACKGROUNDAhmad I, Bailey CR. Time to abandon awake fibreoptic intubation? Anaesthesia. 2016 Jan;71(1):12-6. doi: 10.1111/anae.13333. No abstract available. PMID 26684527
- BACKGROUNDKramer A, Muller D, Pfortner R, Mohr C, Groeben H. Fibreoptic vs videolaryngoscopic (C-MAC((R)) D-BLADE) nasal awake intubation under local anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2015 Apr;70(4):400-6. doi: 10.1111/anae.13016. PMID 25764403
- BACKGROUNDRosenstock CV, Thogersen B, Afshari A, Christensen AL, Eriksen C, Gatke MR. Awake fiberoptic or awake video laryngoscopic tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airway management: a randomized clinical trial. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jun;116(6):1210-6. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318254d085. PMID 22487805
- BACKGROUNDAziz MF, Healy D, Kheterpal S, Fu RF, Dillman D, Brambrink AM. Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: an analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions. Anesthesiology. 2011 Jan;114(1):34-41. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182023eb7. PMID 21150569
- BACKGROUNDCook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C; Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):617-31. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer058. Epub 2011 Mar 29.