Clinical trial · Interventional
Evaluation of Patients Satisfaction of Attachment Retained Versus Clasp Retained Obturators in Unilateral Total Maxillectomy
NCT03146624CI-TRIAL-00027491completedN/AClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
OBJECTIVE to evaluate patients satisfaction of obturator with attachment versus conventional obturator in treatment of unilateral maxillectomy .
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tumour | Neoplasm | ALIAS | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| attachment retained obturator | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
| clasp retained obturator | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- attachment
- description
- attachment retained obturator
- interventionNames
- Other: attachment retained obturator
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- clasp
- description
- clasp retained obturator
- interventionNames
- Other: clasp retained obturator
Primary outcomes (2)
- measure
- patient satisfaction
- timeFrame
- 1 month
- description
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: 1. \- patients with sufficient number of natural teeth(class I and \\or class IV Aramany classification), 2. \- intact soft palate, 3- the mouth opening is not less than 25 mm . Exclusion Criteria: 1- patients are exposed to radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available
No reference posted for this study.