Clinical trial · Observational
Comparing CGM and OGTT in Relation to Iron Overload Detected by Pancreas T2* MRI in High-Risk Hematology Group
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Versus Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) Versus T2* MRI Of The Pancreas In High-Risk Group (Hemoglobinopathies, Lymphoma & Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia): A Comparative Study
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Why stopped (as posted): Due to issues with study design
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
A prospective, observational, comparative study with no intervention.The objective of the study to compare the efficiency of detecting glycemic abnormalities using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGMs) versus Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) and HbA1C (Glycated Hemoglobin) and their relation to iron overload detected by T2\* MRI of the pancreas in high-risk patients due to insulin deficiency (potential beta cell injury) and those with insulin resistance and to study the different factors that may affect the glycemic control in these patients in relation to their results like the Dose of corticosteroids and chemotherapy in ALL and Hemoglobinopathies, Liver function in ALL and Hemoglobinopathies, and Serum ferritin in Hemoglobinopathies and their transfusion status. Using Validated Tools with Permission, the participants will be selected through probability (random) sampling method with expected subjects numbers ALL/L: 30-50, Thalassemia Major: 20, Sickle cell disease: 20.
Conditions
Conditions (4)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
| Hemoglobinopathies | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Iron Overload | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Lymphoma | Lymphoma | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (3)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) | Diagnostic Test | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) | Diagnostic Test | — | UNRESOLVED |
| T2* MRI of the Pancreas | Diagnostic Test | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- label
- High-Risk Group
- description
- The objective of the study to compare the efficiency of detecting glycemic abnormalities using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGMs) versus Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) and HbA1C. versus T2\* MRI of the pancreas (T2\* MRI of the Pancreas) in high-risk patients due to insulin deficiency (potential beta cell injury) and those with insulin resistance and to study the different factors that may affect the glycemic control in these patients in relation to their results like the Dose of corticosteroids and chemotherapy in ALL and Hemoglobinopathies,Liver function in ALL and Hemoglobinopathies, and Serum ferritin in Hemoglobinopathies and their transfusion status.
- interventionNames
- Diagnostic Test: Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)
- Diagnostic Test: Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)
- Diagnostic Test: T2* MRI of the Pancreas
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Efficiency of continuous glucose monitoring compared to oral glucose tolerance and MRI of the Pancreas
- timeFrame
- 12 Months
- description
- Compare the efficiency of detecting glycemic abnormalities using CGMS versus OGTT vs HbA1C. in high-risk patients due to insulin deficiency (potential beta cell injury) and those with insulin resistance. Detect the prevalence of glycemic abnormalities detected in the same group of patients (high-risk patients) using three different modalities of testing (CGMS, OGTT, HbA1C)and T2\*MRI for pancreas
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 14 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * This study will include participants who are High-risk patients to develop glycemic abnormalities: 1. Thalassemia major and SCD (beta cell toxicity and hepatic siderosis) 2. ALL/L ( beta cell injury and hepatic injury due to chemotherapy, and insulin resistance due to corticosteroids) Exclusion Criteria: * Age \< 14 years; * Other systemic diseases, renal disorders or malnourished; * Patients and unwilling to participate in the study.
References
Publications (14)
- BACKGROUNDGross TM, Bode BW, Einhorn D, Kayne DM, Reed JH, White NH, Mastrototaro JJ. Performance evaluation of the MiniMed continuous glucose monitoring system during patient home use. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2000 Spring;2(1):49-56. doi: 10.1089/152091500316737. PMID 11467320
- BACKGROUNDPotts RO, Tamada JA, Tierney MJ. Glucose monitoring by reverse iontophoresis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2002 Jan-Feb;18 Suppl 1:S49-53. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.210. PMID 11921430
- BACKGROUNDBode B, Gross K, Rikalo N, Schwartz S, Wahl T, Page C, Gross T, Mastrototaro J. Alarms based on real-time sensor glucose values alert patients to hypo- and hyperglycemia: the guardian continuous monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2004 Apr;6(2):105-13. doi: 10.1089/152091504773731285. PMID 15117576
- BACKGROUNDHoi-Hansen T, Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Thorsteinsson B. Reproducibility and reliability of hypoglycaemic episodes recorded with Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) in daily life. Diabet Med. 2005 Jul;22(7):858-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01552.x. PMID 15975099
- BACKGROUNDKlonoff DC. Continuous glucose monitoring: roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy. Diabetes Care. 2005 May;28(5):1231-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.5.1231. No abstract available. PMID 15855600
- BACKGROUNDNichols GA, Hillier TA, Brown JB. Progression from newly acquired impaired fasting glusose to type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007 Feb;30(2):228-33. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1392. PMID 17259486
- BACKGROUNDBarr EL, Zimmet PZ, Welborn TA, Jolley D, Magliano DJ, Dunstan DW, Cameron AJ, Dwyer T, Taylor HR, Tonkin AM, Wong TY, McNeil J, Shaw JE. Risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in individuals with diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Circulation. 2007 Jul 10;116(2):151-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685628. Epub 2007 Jun 18.