Clinical trial · Interventional
BIO4 Clinical Case Study: Cervical Spine
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of BIO4 Bone Matrix in Patients Undergoing 1 or 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery
NCT03077204CI-TRIAL-00055993completedPhase 4Results postedClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The goal of this study is to investigate the efficacy of BIO4 bone matrix in patients undergoing 1 or 2-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) spine surgery. Specifically, the study aims to collect the data for ACDF model utilizing BIO4 with Bio AVS Cervical Allograft (with graft window).
Conditions
Conditions (3)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Degenerative Disc Disease | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Spondylolisthesis | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Trauma (Including Fractures) | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 or 2-Level ACDF utilizing BIO4 with Bio AVS Cervical Allograft (with graft window). | Biological | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Aviator Anterior Cervical Plating System | Device | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- type
- OTHER
- label
- BIO4 treatment
- description
- Patients undergoing 1 or 2-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) spine surgery utilizing BIO4 with Bio AVS Cervical Allograft (with graft window).
- interventionNames
- Biological: 1 or 2-Level ACDF utilizing BIO4 with Bio AVS Cervical Allograft (with graft window).
- Device: Aviator Anterior Cervical Plating System
Primary outcomes (2)
- measure
- Radiological Assessment : Fusion Status
- timeFrame
- Post-op 1 year
- description
- This will be used to monitor the fusion status at 1 year post-op. The fusion states was reported as the number of patients who fused. If fused, then we say "Yes". We counted the number of patients who fused. If all 20 patients fused then we said there were 20 "yes".
- measure
- Arthrodesis Rates
- timeFrame
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 19 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria 1. Age\>18 years 2. Scheduled 1 or 2-level ACDF spine surgery 3. The capacity to provide informed consent. 4. Subject has one or more of the following diagnoses: 1. Degenerative Disc Disease (as defined by neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies) 2. Trauma (including fractures) 3. Tumors 4. Deformities or curvatures (including kyphosis, lordosis, or scoliosis) 5. Pseudoarthrosis 6. Failed previous fusion 7. Decompression of the spinal cord following total or partial cervical vertebrectomy 8. Spondylolisthesis 9. Spinal stenosis Exclusion Criteria Patients with any of the following conditions will be excluded, or if enrolled and found to be ineligible and do not fit the inclusion criteria, will be withdrawn from the study. 1. Patients with current or recent history of malignancy or infectious disease. 2. The inability to provide informed consent. 3. Subject has marked local inflammation 4. Subject has any mental or neuromuscular disorder which would create an unacceptable risk of fixation failure or complications in postoperative care. 5. Subject has a bone stock compromised by disease, infection or prior implantation which cannot provide adequate support and/or fixation to the devices. 6. Subject has bone abnormalities preventing safe screw fixation. 7. Subject has any open wounds. 8. Subject has rapid joint disease, bone absorption, osteopenia, osteomalacia, and/or osteoporosis. Osteoporosis or osteopenia are relative contraindications, since this condition may limit the degree of obtainable correction and/or the amount of mechanical fixation. 9. Subject has a documented or suspected metal sensitivity. 10. Subject is pregnant. 11. Subject has anatomical structures or physiological performance that would interfere with implant utilization. 12. Subject has inadequate tissue coverage over the operative site. 13. Subject has other medical or surgical conditions which would preclude the potential benefit of surgery, such as congenital abnormalities, immunosuppressive disease, elevation of sedimentation rate unexplained by other diseases, elevation of white blood count (WBC), or marked left shift in the WBC differential count. 14. Note: The Aviator Anterior Cervical Plating System is not approved or intended for screw attachment to the posterior elements (pedicles) of the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine. The surgeon must consider the levels of implantation, patient weight, patient activity level, and other patient conditions which may impact on the performance of the system.
References
Publications (6)
- BACKGROUNDRoberts TT, Rosenbaum AJ. Bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics: the bridge between basic science and clinical advancements in fracture healing. Organogenesis. 2012 Oct-Dec;8(4):114-24. doi: 10.4161/org.23306. Epub 2012 Oct 1. PMID 23247591
- BACKGROUND• Osiris Therapeutics-Data on File
- BACKGROUND• Bourke HE, Sandison A, Hughes SPF and Reichert ILH. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in Human Periosteum- Normal Expression and Response to Fracture, "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume (2003)
- BACKGROUNDEpstein NE. An analysis of noninstrumented posterolateral lumbar fusions performed in predominantly geriatric patients using lamina autograft and beta tricalcium phosphate. Spine J. 2008 Nov-Dec;8(6):882-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.11.005. Epub 2008 Feb 14. PMID 18280215
- BACKGROUNDEpstein NE. Beta tricalcium phosphate: observation of use in 100 posterolateral lumbar instrumented fusions. Spine J. 2009 Aug;9(8):630-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Jun 4. PMID 19501025
- BACKGROUNDEastlack RK, Garfin SR, Brown CR, Meyer SC. Osteocel Plus cellular allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcomes from a prospective multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Oct 15;39(22):E1331-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000557. PMID 25188591