Clinical trial · Interventional
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid and Low Rectal Cancer (TaLaR): a Multicentre Randomised Clinical Trial
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer has been successfully proven to be a non-inferior alternative regarding resection quality, and oncological outcomes of patients as compared to open surgery in mangy clinical trails. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery is advantageous over open surgery with regard to operative invasiveness, patient's recovery, and wound related complications. Thus, laparoscopic surgery has gained great popularity over the past decades. However, specifically for mid and low rectal cancer, laparoscopic surgery is technically demanding, which sometimes leads to high morbidity and unsatisfactory resection quality, especially in challenging cases such as bulky mesorectum, enlarged prostate, irradiated pelvis, etc. Under this circumstance, transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) , the so called "down-to-up" alternative, has emerged as a promising solution to these problems in recent years and more and more small studies have proven the feasibility and advantages of this technique, making it become a hot topic among both literature and conferences. However, TaTME is still at early birth, higher-level evidences, either multicentric, or comparative study with conventional surgery is strikingly lacking. Thus the investigators conduct this multicentre randomised clinical trial, comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer, aiming to prove the hypothesis that TaTME may achieve better resection quality and result in non-inferior oncological outcome, as well as short term operative morbidity and mortality.
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rectal Neoplasms Malignant | Rectal Neoplasm | PROBABILISTIC | 0.70 |
| Surgery | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| LpTME | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| TaTME | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision
- description
- The rectum is mobilized and resected transanally (from bottom to up) according to TME principles, via transanal platform (either rigid or flexible platform).An ideal TaTME is defined as the extraperitoneal portion of the rectum being mobilized from below.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: TaTME
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision
- description
- The traditional laparoscopic TME (LpTME) was performed via standard laparoscopic techniques, including multiple trocars and conventional laparoscopic instruments.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: LpTME
Primary outcomes (2)
- measure
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 75 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: histologically proven rectal adenocarcinoma; tumor located below the level of peritoneal reflection ; diagnosis of rectal cancer amenable to curative surgery; no evidence of distant metastases; preoperative tumor stage within III; no threaten mesorectal fascia (MRF)after neoadjuvant therapy; no contraindication to laparoscopic surgery; without history of other malignancies; Written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: could not perform sphincter preservation surgery (requiring a Mile's procedure); T4b tumor invading adjacent organs; T1 tumors that can be locally resected should take neoadjuvant therapy but refuse it; recurrent cancer; concurrent or previous diagnosis of invasive cancer within 5 years; emergent surgery with intestinal obstruction or perforation; history of colorectal surgery; fecal incontinence; history of inflammatory bowel disease; with contraindications to general anaesthesia(ASA class 4 or 5); pregnant or breast-feeding; history of mental disorder
References
Publications (5)
- BACKGROUNDChen WH, Kang L, Luo SL, Zhang XW, Huang Y, Liu ZH, Wang JP. Transanal total mesorectal excision assisted by single-port laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Sep;19(9):527-34. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1342-1. Epub 2015 Jul 29. PMID 26220109
- BACKGROUNDKang L, Chen WH, Luo SL, Luo YX, Liu ZH, Huang MJ, Wang JP. Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a preliminary report. Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2552-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4521-2. Epub 2015 Aug 27. PMID 26310534
- DERIVEDZeng Z, Luo S, Zhang H, Wu M, Ma D, Wang Q, Xie M, Xu Q, Ouyang J, Xiao Y, Song Y, Feng B, Xu Q, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Shi L, Ling L, Zhang X, Huang L, Yang Z, Peng J, Wu X, Ren D, Huang M, Lan P, Wang J, Tong W, Ren M, Liu H, Kang L; Chinese Transanal Endoscopic Surgery Collaborative (CTESC) Group. Transanal vs Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision and 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Rectal Cancer: The TaLaR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Mar 4;333(9):774-783. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.24276. PMID 39847361
- DERIVEDChen M, Ye F, Huang P, Liang Z, Liu H, Zheng X, Li W, Luo S, Kang L, Huang L. Inflammatory stress response after transanal vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a cohort study based on the TaLaR trial. Int J Surg. 2024 Jan 1;110(1):151-158. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000838. PMID 37916926
- DERIVEDZeng Z, Luo S, Chen J, Cai Y, Zhang X, Kang L. Comparison of pathological outcomes after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a prospective study using data from randomized control trial. Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):3956-3962. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07167-1. Epub 2019 Oct 4. PMID 31586244