Clinical trial · Interventional
Comparing an Operation to Monitoring, With or Without Endocrine Therapy (COMET) Trial For Low Risk DCIS
Comparing an Operation to Monitoring, With or Without Endocrine Therapy (COMET) Trial For Low Risk DCIS: A Phase III Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT02926911CI-TRIAL-00111229COMETactive not recruitingN/AResults postedClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
This study looks at the risks and benefits of active monitoring (AM) compared to surgery in the setting of a pragmatic prospective randomized trial for low risk DCIS. Our overarching hypothesis is that management of low-risk Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) using an AM approach does not yield inferior cancer or quality of life outcomes compared to surgery.
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCIS | Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ | ALIAS | 0.90 |
| Ductal Carcinoma in Situ | Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ | ALIAS | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Monitoring | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Surgery | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Surgery
- description
- DCIS - Surgery +/- radiation choice for endocrine therapy (MMG q 12 months x 5 years usual care for recurrent disease)
- interventionNames
- Other: Surgery
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Active Monitoring
- description
- DCIS - Choice for endocrine therapy (MMG q 6 months x 5 years GCC for invasive progression)
- interventionNames
- Other: Active Monitoring
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Proportion of New Diagnoses of Ipsilateral Invasive Cancer in Surgery and AM Arms at 2 Years of Follow up
- timeFrame
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Female
- Minimum age
- 40 Years
- Maximum age
- 99 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of unilateral, bilateral, unifocal, multifocal, or multicentric DCIS without invasive breast cancer (date of diagnosis defined as the date of the first pathology report that diagnosed the patient with DCIS) OR: atypia verging on DCIS OR: DCIS + LCIS (mix and/or separate locations in the same breast) * A patient who has had a lumpectomy or partial mastectomy with margins positive for DCIS (i.e. \<2mm/ink on tumor) as part of their treatment for a current DCIS diagnosis is also eligible (post-excision bilateral mammogram required at enrollment to establish a new baseline) * No previous DCIS or invasive breast cancer in ipsilateral breast 5 years prior to current DCIS diagnosis * 40 years of age or older at time of DCIS diagnosis * ECOG performance status 0 or 1 * No contraindication for surgery * Baseline imaging (must include dimensions): * Unilateral DCIS: contralateral normal mammogram ≤ 6 months of registration and ipsilateral breast imaging ≤ 120 days of registration (must include ipsilateral mammogram; can also include ultrasound or breast MRI) * Bilateral DCIS: bilateral breast imaging ≤ 120 days of registration (must include bilateral mammogram; can also include ultrasound or breast MRI) * DCIS s/p lumpectomy: post excision mammogram on side of excision ≤ 60 days of registration * Pathologic criteria: * Any grade I DCIS (irrespective of necrosis/comedonecrosis) * Any grade II DCIS (irrespective of necrosis/comedonecrosis) * Absence of invasion or microinvasion * Diagnosis of DCIS confirmed on core needle biopsy, vacuum-assisted or surgery ≤ 120 days of registration * ER(+) and/or PR(+) by IHC (≥ 10% staining or Allred score ≥ 4) unless atypia verging on DCIS in which case biomarker criterion does not apply * HER2 0, 1+, or 2+ by IHC if HER2 testing is performed * Histology slides reviewed and agreement between two clinical pathologists (not required to be at same institution) that pathology fulfills COMET eligibility criteria. In cases of disagreement between the two pathology reviews about whether or not a case fulfills the eligibility criteria, a third pathology review will be required. * At least two sites of biopsy for those cases where individual mammographic extent of calcifications exceeds 4 cm, with second biopsy benign or both sites fulfilling pathology eligibility criteria (ER/PR testing required for second biopsy) * Amenable to follow up examinations * Ability to read, understand and evaluate study materials and willingness to sign a written informed consent document * Reads and speaks Spanish or English Exclusion Criteria: * Male DCIS * Grade III DCIS * Concurrent diagnosis of invasive or microinvasive breast cancer in either breast * Documented mass on examination or mass/hypoechoic area on imaging at site of DCIS prior to biopsy yielding diagnosis of DCIS, with exception of: subsequent lumpectomy or partial mastectomy (with positive DCIS margins i.e. \<2mm/ink on tumor) followed by a post-surgery MMG; fibroadenoma at a distinct/separate site from site of DCIS; or diagnosis of mass/hypoechoic area as a cyst or a papilloma. In cases of uncertainty about whether the mass was present on physical examination prior to biopsy, the following criteria should be applied: if mammogram noting abnormal findings is diagnostic MMG = symptomatic/if mammogram noting abnormal findings is screening MMG = asymptomatic. If a patient has a mass on imaging that is biopsied (worked-up) and does not show invasive breast cancer, they are eligible. If a patient has a mass on initial MMG that is not seen on subsequent MMG, they are eligible (if initial mass occurred due to additional work-up). * Any color/bloody nipple discharge (ipsilateral breast) * Mammographic finding of BIRADS 4 or greater within 6 months prior to registration at site of breast other than that of known DCIS, without pathologic assessment * Use of investigational cancer agents within 6 weeks prior to diagnosis of DCIS * Any serious and/or unstable pre-existing medical, psychiatric, or other existing condition that would prevent compliance with the trial or consent process * Pregnancy. If a woman has been confirmed as pregnant, she will not be eligible to take part in the trial. If she suspects there is a chance that she may be pregnant, a pregnancy test should be undertaken, although a pregnancy test for all women of child-bearing potential is not mandatory. In addition, if a woman becomes pregnant once registered to the trial, she can continue to be followed (endocrine therapy is not a mandatory requirement of the study) * Documented history of prior tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitor, or raloxifene use in the 6 months prior to registration * Current use of exogenous hormones (i.e. oral progesterone)
References
Publications (8)
- BACKGROUNDErnster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Zheng Y, Weaver DL, Cutter G, Yankaskas BC, Rosenberg R, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Taplin SH, Urban N, Geller BM. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Oct 16;94(20):1546-54. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.20.1546. PMID 12381707
- BACKGROUNDErbas B, Provenzano E, Armes J, Gertig D. The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 May;97(2):135-44. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-9101-z. Epub 2005 Dec 1. PMID 16319971
- BACKGROUNDOzanne EM, Shieh Y, Barnes J, Bouzan C, Hwang ES, Esserman LJ. Characterizing the impact of 25 years of DCIS treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Aug;129(1):165-73. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1430-5. Epub 2011 Mar 9. PMID 21390494
- BACKGROUNDNystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, Lindgren A, Lindqvist M, Ryden S, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Fagerberg G, Frisell J, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 1993 Apr 17;341(8851):973-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91067-v. PMID 8096941
- DERIVEDPartridge AH, Hyslop T, Rosenberg SM, Bennett AV, Drier S, Jonsson M, Shimada A, Li Y, Li Y, Lynch T, Frank E, Collyar D, Basila D, Pinto D, Weiss A, Wolf A, Norris K, Witten M, Boisvert M, Giuliano A, Larson KE, Yost K, McAuliffe PF, Krie A, Tamirisa N, Darai S, Carey L, Thompson A, Hwang ES; COMET Study Consortium. Patient-Reported Outcomes for Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Secondary Analysis of the COMET Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2025 Mar 1;11(3):300-309. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.6556. PMID 39665588
- DERIVEDHwang ES, Hyslop T, Lynch T, Ryser MD, Weiss A, Wolf A, Norris K, Witten M, Grimm L, Schnitt S, Badve S, Factor R, Frank E, Collyar D, Basila D, Pinto D, Watson MA, West R, Davies L, Donovan JL, Shimada A, Li Y, Li Y, Bennett AV, Rosenberg S, Marks J, Winer E, Boisvert M, Giuliano A, Larson KE, Yost K, McAuliffe PF, Krie A, Tamirisa N, Carey LA, Thompson AM, Partridge AH; COMET Study Investigators. Active Monitoring With or Without Endocrine Therapy for Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: The COMET Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Mar 18;333(11):972-980. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.26698.