Clinical trial · Interventional
Incorporating Veterans' Preferences Into Lung Cancer Screening Decisions
Incorporating Veterans Preferences Into Lung Cancer Screening Decisions
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Veterans have a high risk of developing lung in comparison to general populations due to their older age and smoking history. Recent evidence indicates that lung cancer screening with low dose CT scan reduces lung cancer mortality among older heavy smokers. However, the rates of false positive findings are high, requiring further testing and evaluation. The aims of this study were to 1) elicit patient and provider stakeholder input to inform the development of a lung cancer screening decision tool, 2) develop a web-based Lung Cancer Screening Decision Tool (LCSDecTool) that incorporates patient and provider input, and 3) conduct a RCT to evaluate LCSDecTool compared to usual care knowledge about LCS, decisional conflict and uptake of LCS. The investigators hypothesized that the use of the LCSDecTool would decrease decisional conflict at 1 month. As a secondary outcome the investigators hypothesized that there would be a decrease in uptake of LCS in the LCDDecTool group compared with the control intervention due to increased awareness of harms associated with LCS. Additional secondary outcomes were LCS knowledge, decisional regret, anxiety, and lung cancer worry. Veterans who were receiving primary care in a participating VA Medical Center, aged 55 to 80 years with a smoking history of at least 30 pack-years who were current smokers or had quit within the past 15 years were eligible to participate in the study. Participants were asked to link on to a study website and were randomly assigned to the LCSDecTool or a control intervention website. Following use of the intervention, participants had a primary care visit. Patient reported outcomes were assessed immediately post intervention and at 1 and 3-months post intervention. LCS uptake was assessed at 6 months post-intervention.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lung Cancer Screening | Lung Neoplasm | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control Intervention | Behavioral | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Lung Cancer Screening Decision Tool | Behavioral | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Intervention Group
- description
- Participants in this arm will use the lung cancer screening decision aid (LCSDecTool)
- interventionNames
- Behavioral: Lung Cancer Screening Decision Tool
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Control Group
- description
- Content that provides general information on disease prevention and health promotion unrelated to lung cancer. The information will be delivered on the same modality and take a similar amount of time to administer.
- interventionNames
- Behavioral: Control Intervention
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Decisional Conflict
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 55 Years
- Maximum age
- 80 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 55-80 years * Enrolled in a Patient Aligned Care Team at a participating site * 30 or more pack years of smoking * Active smoker or quit smoking within 15 years Exclusion Criteria: * Cognitive impairment as determined by clinical history * Previous diagnosis of cancer with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer and localized prostate cancer that is 1-year post-diagnosis * Life expectancy of less than 2 years as indicated by chart review and conformation with PCPC * Inability to speak English * Active surveillance of Lung Nodule, * Enrolled in CMCVAMC Lung Cancer Screening Program
References
Publications (5)
- BACKGROUNDSchapira MM. The Conundrum and Challenge of Lung Cancer Screening Shared Decision-making Implementation. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):989-990. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4449-z. No abstract available. PMID 29736754
- BACKGROUNDKim RY, Rendle KA, Mitra N, Saia CA, Neslund-Dudas C, Greenlee RT, Burnett-Hartman AN, Honda SA, Simoff MJ, Schapira MM, Croswell JM, Meza R, Ritzwoller DP, Vachani A. Racial Disparities in Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening and Recommended Follow-Up Care: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Sep;19(9):1561-1569. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202111-1253OC. PMID 35167781
- BACKGROUNDSchapira MM, Rendle KA. Rising to the De-escalation Challenge: Multilevel Change Needed to Align Clinical Practice with Cancer Screening Guidelines. Med Decis Making. 2022 Nov;42(8):1045-1047. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221125168. No abstract available. PMID 36255190
- RESULTSchapira MM, Rodriguez KL, Chhatre S, Fraenkel L, Bastian LA, Kravetz JD, Asan O, Akers S, Vachani A, Prigge JM, Meline J, Ibarra JV, Corn B, Kaminstein D. When Is a Harm a Harm? Discordance between Patient and Medical Experts' Evaluation of Lung Cancer Screening Attributes. Med Decis Making. 2021 Apr;41(3):317-328. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20987221. Epub 2021 Feb 6. PMID 33554740
- RESULTSchapira MM, Hubbard RA, Whittle J, Vachani A, Kaminstein D, Chhatre S, Rodriguez KL, Bastian LA, Kravetz JD, Asan O, Prigge JM, Meline J, Schrand S, Ibarra JV, Dye DA, Rieder JB, Frempong JO, Fraenkel L. Lung Cancer Screening Decision Aid Designed for a Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2330452. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30452. PMID 37647070