Clinical trial · Observational
Cost-Effectiveness and Patients Satisfaction of Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Laparoscopic surgery is gaining currency in the field of oncologic care, particularly for colorectal and gynecologic cancers. This innovation could be used either for staging purpose and therefore could steer global therapeutic options or for surgical management only. Increase knowledge and skills lead to an increase in the number and rate of the women this innovation could be offered. The project team observed a shift from traditional surgical management (abdominal radical surgery) towards laparoscopic with a focus on lymphadenectomy. This innovation however increases some costs (the surgical stage) but decrease some others (the post surgical stage). Foreseeing the pace of the dissemination needs to have objective and reliable data about who had access to laparoscopic surgery and who didn't (and why) and accurate assessment of related costs. This program will focus on uterine cancer (both cervix and corpus).
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS | Endometrial Neoplasm | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
| UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS | Cervical Neoplasm | ALIAS | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional surgery (abdominal radical surgery) | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- label
- Uterine oncologic Indications for surgery
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications
- Procedure: Conventional surgery (abdominal radical surgery)
Primary outcomes (2)
- measure
- Cost comparison between Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy
- timeFrame
- 2 years
- description
- The following costs were included:Equipment costs,Instrument costs,Operating room costs,Hospital stay
- measure
- Comparison of the effectiveness of procedures (Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy)
- timeFrame
- 2 years
- description
- Comparison of the effectiveness of procedures will take into account conversion rate, complications rate, metastatic and pelvic relapse
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Female
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Age\>18 years * Endometrial or cervical cancer Exclusion Criteria: \-
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available