Clinical trial · Observational
3D Laparoscopy Versus 2D Laparoscopy
3D vs 2D Colorectal Resections and Valuation of Visual Load of Surgeons
NCT02841657CI-TRIAL-00028965Lap3DunknownClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
* To compare surgical and oncological outcomes in patients underwent to colorectal resection with 3D vs 2D laparoscopic technique. * To evaluate the visual overload in surgeons using 3D laparoscopic technique.
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colorectal Cancer | Malignant Colorectal Neoplasm | CURATED_BROADER | 0.80 |
| Inflammatory Bowel Disease | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (0)
Data not yet available
No intervention recorded.
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (0)
[]Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Postoperative complications
- timeFrame
- through study completion, an average of 2 years
- description
- The postoperative course is evaluate in all patients undergone to colorectal laparoscopic surgery and classified according to the Dindo-Clavien scale at 30 days after surgery (Dindo-Clavien classification of surgical classification).
Secondary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Oncological radicality
- timeFrame
- through study completion, an average of 2 years
- description
- The R0/R1 rate is evaluate in patients undergone to 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * colorectal cancer with or without preoperative radio e chemiotherapy * inflammatory bowel disease affected colon and rectum that need surgery Exclusion Criteria: * patients under 18 years
References
Publications (11)
- RESULTPoudel S, Kurashima Y, Watanabe Y, Ebihara Y, Tamoto E, Murakami S, Nakamura T, Tsuchikawa T, Okamura K, Shichinohe T, Hirano S. Impact of 3D in the training of basic laparoscopic skills and its transferability to 2D environment: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1111-1118. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5074-8. Epub 2016 Jun 28. PMID 27351662
- RESULTSinha RY, Raje SR, Rao GA. Three-dimensional laparoscopy: Principles and practice. J Minim Access Surg. 2017 Jul-Sep;13(3):165-169. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.181761. PMID 27143695
- RESULTShakir F, Jan H, Kent A. 3D straight-stick laparoscopy versus 3D robotics for task performance in novice surgeons: a randomised crossover trial. Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5380-5387. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4893-y. Epub 2016 Apr 8. PMID 27059971
- RESULTSakata S, Watson MO, Grove PM, Stevenson AR. The Conflicting Evidence of Three-dimensional Displays in Laparoscopy: A Review of Systems Old and New. Ann Surg. 2016 Feb;263(2):234-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001504. PMID 26501704
- RESULTUsta TA, Gundogdu EC. The role of three-dimensional high-definition laparoscopic surgery for gynaecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;27(4):297-301. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000189. PMID 26107783
- RESULTOzsoy M, Kallidonis P, Kyriazis I, Panagopoulos V, Vasilas M, Sakellaropoulos GC, Liatsikos E. Novice surgeons: do they benefit from 3D laparoscopy? Lasers Med Sci. 2015 May;30(4):1325-33. doi: 10.1007/s10103-015-1739-0. Epub 2015 Mar 15. PMID 25772250
- RESULTAshraf A, Collins D, Whelan M, O'Sullivan R, Balfe P. Three-dimensional (3D) simulation versus two-dimensional (2D) enhances surgical skills acquisition in standardised laparoscopic tasks: a before and after study. Int J Surg. 2015 Feb;14:12-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.12.020. Epub 2015 Jan 2.