Microsurgical Treatment of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema by Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis

Research question: Is lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) for the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema of the arm (BCRL) more effective and cost-effective compared to standard conservative treatment? Hypothesis: LVA improves the health-related quality of life of patients who developed BCRL after breast cancer treatment and is cost-effective compared to conservative treatment. Study design: A multicenter randomised controlled trial (RCT) consisting of two treatment groups: conservative treatment (group A) and LVA (group B). The study is conducted in Maastricht University Medical Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Zuyderland Medical Center and Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital. Study population: Women over 18 years old who underwent (axillary) treatment for breast cancer presenting with early stage lymphedema of the arm for which they received at least three months conservative treatment Intervention: LVA involves anastomosing lymphatic vessels to small veins to bypass obstructions in the lymphatic system. Usual care: Complex decongestive therapy (CDT) which includes skin care, manual lymphatic drainage, and compression therapy. Outcome measures: The primary outcome is health-related quality of life after 12 months follow-up measured with the Lymph-ICF questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are (in)direct costs, QALYs, cost-effectiveness ratio, the discontinuation rate of conservative treatment, and excess limb volume. Sample size: A total of 120 patients will be included and randomised in two groups of 60 patients each. Cost-effectiveness analysis: A trial-based economic evaluation is performed from the societal perspective to determine the cost-effectiveness, expressed in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (i.e. cost per QALY gained), of LVA compared to CDT. Direct and indirect cost data is collected on the patient-level. The difference in QALYs is assessed with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. A Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) will be performed to analyse the financial consequences related to implementing LVA. Time schedule: Patient inclusion will take maximally 21 months. With a follow-up of 24 months, the total study period will be 48 months. The last three months are used for data analysis. Outcome assessment is at inclusion (before randomisation) and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months later.

Sex

Female

Minimum age

18 Years

Maximum age

99 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Women over 18 years old
* Treated for early stage breast cancer and who underwent an sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiotherapy
* Early stage lymphedema of the arm (ISL classification stage I/IIa; pitting edema without fibrosis) with viable lymphatic vessels as determined by indocyanin green (ICG) lymphography
* Already received at least three months of complex decongestive therapy (CDT) prior to inclusion
* Primary breast cancer
* Unilateral lymphedema
* Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* Male sex
* Late stage lymphedema of the arm (ISL classification IIb/III lymphedema) with evident fat deposition and/or fibrosis
* History of earlier lymph reconstruction efforts
* Recurrent breast cancer
* Distant breast cancer metastases
* Bilateral lymphedema
* Primary congenital lymphedema
* Non-viable lymphatic system as determined by ICG lymphography

• DERIVEDKleeven A, Jonis YMJ, Currie O, Wolfs J, Kimman M, Tielemans H, van der Hulst RRWJ, Hummelink S, Qiu SS. Economic evaluation of lymphaticovenous anastomosis versus conservative therapy for breast cancer-related lymphoedema: secondary outcome analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2026 Jun 4;113(6):znag062. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znag062. PMID 42161329
• DERIVEDJonis YMJ, Wolfs JAGN, Hummelink S, Tielemans HJP, Keuter XHA, van Kuijk S, Ulrich DJO, van der Hulst RRWJ, Qiu SS. The 6 month interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial assessing the quality of life in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema undergoing lymphaticovenous anastomosis vs. conservative therapy. Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 26;14(1):2238. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52489-3. PMID 38278856
• DERIVEDWolfs J, Beugels J, Kimman M, Piatkowski de Grzymala AA, Heuts E, Keuter X, Tielemans H, Ulrich D, van der Hulst R, Qiu SS. Improving the quality of life of patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema by lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA): study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 15;10(1):e035337. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035337. PMID 31948992