The aim of Patient-Centred Innovations for Persons With Multimorbidity (PACE in MM) study is to reorient the health care system from a single disease focus to a multimorbidity focus; centre on not only disease but also the patient in context; and realign the health care system from separate silos to coordinated collaborations in care. PACE in MM will propose multifaceted innovations in Chronic Disease Prevention and Management (CDPM) that will be grounded in current realities (i.e. Chronic Care Models including Self-Management Programs), that are linked to Primary Care (PC) reform efforts. The study will build on this firm foundation, will design and test promising innovations and will achieve transformation by creating structures to sustain relationships among researchers, decision-makers, practitioners, and patients. The Team will conduct inter-jurisdictional comparisons and is mainly a Quebec (QC) - Ontario (ON) collaboration with participation from 3 other provinces: British Columbia (BC); Manitoba (MB); and Nova Scotia (NS). The Team's objectives are: 1) to identify factors responsible for success or failure of current CDPM programs linked to the PC reform, by conducting a realist synthesis of their quantitative and qualitative evaluations; 2) to transform consenting CDPM programs identified in Objective 1, by aligning them to promising interventions on patient-centred care for multimorbidity patients, and to test these new innovations' in at least two jurisdictions and compare among jurisdictions; and 3) to foster the scaling-up of innovations informed by Objective 1 and tested/proven in Objective 2, and to conduct research on different approaches to scaling-up. This registration for Clinical Trials only pertains to Objective 2 of the study.
Conditions
Conditions (30)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
Intervention group (n = 163) Intervention: Participates in DIMAC02 Program
interventionNames
Behavioral: DIMAC02
type
NO_INTERVENTION
label
Group B
description
Control group (n = 163)
type
NO_INTERVENTION
label
Group C
description
Health Administrative Data Group (n = 1630) Number of matched data controls. Not taking part in intervention.
Primary outcomes (1)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
Sex
All
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
80 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
PATIENTS (Studies 2.1 \& 2.2):
Inclusion Criteria:
* 3+ Chronic Conditions
* 18 to 80 years of age
* Eligible for DIMAC02 intervention
Exclusion Criteria:
* Unable to reasonably respond to questionnaires or provide informed consent (ie. cognitive impairment or language barrier)
* Deemed by provider to be too fragile
CAREGIVERS (Study 2.1):
* Close family member (wife/husband, parent, son/daughter, brother/sister) and/or caregiver to a patient that has received DIMAC02 intervention (first component)
* Sharing time with the patient (before, during and after the intervention)
* French speaking
DECISION-MAKERS (Study 2.1):
* FMG Physician-Manager, FMG Coordinators, Decision-Makers/Managers
* Involved/Familiar with DIMAC02 program
DIMAC02 INTERDISCIPLINARY team (Study 2.1):
* Nurse, Nutritionist, Kinesiologist, Social Worker, Psychologist
* Has delivered DIMAC02 intervention to at least one patient
REFERRAL PROFESSIONALS (Study 2.1):
\- Family physician or nurse/nurse practitioner
References
Publications (22)
BACKGROUNDBest A, Greenhalgh T, Lewis S, Saul JE, Carroll S, Bitz J. Large-system transformation in health care: a realist review. Milbank Q. 2012 Sep;90(3):421-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00670.x. PMID 22985277
BACKGROUNDPawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage, 1997
BACKGROUNDCrabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc. 1999.
BACKGROUNDMoher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG; Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Group. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):e1-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 Mar 25. PMID 20346624
BACKGROUNDPoitras ME, Fortin M, Hudon C, Haggerty J, Almirall J. Validation of the disease burden morbidity assessment by self-report in a French-speaking population. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb 14;12:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-35. PMID 22333434
BACKGROUNDStewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, McWhinney IR, Oates J, Weston WW, Jordan J. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000 Sep;49(9):796-804. PMID 11032203
BACKGROUNDStewart M, Brown JB, Hammerton J, Donner A, Gavin A, Holliday RL, Whelan T, Leslie K, Cohen I, Weston W, Freeman T. Improving communication between doctors and breast cancer patients. Ann Fam Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;5(5):387-94. doi: 10.1370/afm.721. PMID 17893379
BACKGROUNDStewart M, et al., The patient perception of patient-centeredness questionnaire (PPPC). Working Paper Series #04-1, April 2004.
Crohn's Disease
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Dementia
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Depression
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Diabetes
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Diverticulosis
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Gastroesophageal Reflux
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Heart Failure
—
UNRESOLVED
—
HIV
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Hyperlipidemia
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Hypertension
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Irritable Bowel
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Kidney Disease
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Musculoskeletal Pain
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Osteoporosis
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Rheumatoid Arthritis
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Stroke
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Thyroid Disorder
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Transient Ischemic Attacks
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Ulcer
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Ulcerative Colitis
—
UNRESOLVED
—
Urinary Tract Problem
—
UNRESOLVED
—
measure
Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Self-Management outcomes
timeFrame
T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2; T4: one year after T3
description
Health Education Impact Questionnaire (HeiQ). Score: Reliable improvement
Secondary outcomes (10)
measure
Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Chronic Diseases
timeFrame
T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2; T4: one year after T3
description
Multimorbidity/Chronic Disease (MM-21): Score: number of Chronic diseases
measure
Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Health Status
timeFrame
T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2; T4: one year after T3
description
Health Status (VR-12): Score: Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)
measure
Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Quality of Life
timeFrame
T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2; T4: one year after T3
description
Quality of Life (EQ5D-5L): Score: mean
measure
Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Psychological Well-being
timeFrame
T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2; T4: one year after T3
description
Psychological Well-being (Kessler 6 Scale).Score: mean
measure
Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Lifestyle/Health Behaviours
timeFrame
T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2; T4: one year after T3
description
Lifestyle/Health Behaviours Questionnaire. Score: mean
measure
Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Equity
timeFrame
T1: Baseline
measure
Demographics
timeFrame
T1: Baseline
measure
Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Transitions of Care
timeFrame
T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2; T4: one year after T3
description
Patient Perception of Transitions of Care. Score: Mean
measure
Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Self-Efficacy
timeFrame
T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2; T4: one year after T3
description
Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease Scale (SEM-CD). Score: mean
measure
Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Patient-Centredness
timeFrame
T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2; T4: one year after T3
description
Patient Perception of Patient-Centredness (PPPC). Score: Mean
BACKGROUNDColeman EA, Mahoney E, Parry C. Assessing the quality of preparation for posthospital care from the patient's perspective: the care transitions measure. Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):246-55. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00007. PMID 15725981
BACKGROUNDNolte S, Elsworth GR, Sinclair AJ, Osborne RH. The extent and breadth of benefits from participating in chronic disease self-management courses: a national patient-reported outcomes survey. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Mar;65(3):351-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.08.016. Epub 2006 Oct 5. PMID 17027221
BACKGROUNDSherer M., et al., The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports. 51: p. 663-671,1982.
BACKGROUNDRasanen P, Roine E, Sintonen H, Semberg-Konttinen V, Ryynanen OP, Roine R. Use of quality-adjusted life years for the estimation of effectiveness of health care: A systematic literature review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Spring;22(2):235-41. doi: 10.1017/S0266462306051051. PMID 16571199
BACKGROUNDKessler RC, Barker PR, Colpe LJ, Epstein JF, Gfroerer JC, Hiripi E, Howes MJ, Normand SL, Manderscheid RW, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM. Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;60(2):184-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184. PMID 12578436
BACKGROUNDCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire. 2007, Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
BACKGROUNDVan Breukelen GJ. ANCOVA versus change from baseline: more power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies [corrected]. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Sep;59(9):920-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.007. Epub 2006 Jun 23. PMID 16895814
BACKGROUNDDaniel, W.W., Biostatistics: A foundation for analysis in the health sciences. 9th ed. Hoboken. NJ: Wiley. 2009.
BACKGROUNDCanadian Institute for Health Information. Canadian Hospital Reporting Project (CHRP). 2012; https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/HI2013_Jan30_EN.pdf . Accessed 2016 March 14.
BACKGROUNDWodchis, WP, et al., Guidelines on Person-Level Costing Using Administrative Databases in Ontario. Toronto: Health System Performance Research Network, 2011.
BACKGROUNDDrummond, MF, et al., Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
DERIVEDNgangue P, Brown JB, Forgues C, Ag Ahmed MA, Nguyen TN, Sasseville M, Loignon C, Gallagher F, Stewart M, Fortin M. Evaluating the implementation of interdisciplinary patient-centred care intervention for people with multimorbidity in primary care: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 24;11(9):e046914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046914. PMID 34561255
DERIVEDStewart M, Fortin M; Patient-Centred Innovations for Persons with Multimorbidity Team*. Patient-Centred Innovations for Persons with Multimorbidity: funded evaluation protocol. CMAJ Open. 2017 May 9;5(2):E365-E372. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20160097. PMID 28487349