Clinical trial · Interventional
Effect of Prehabilitation in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Study Protocol of a Multicentric, Randomised Control Trial
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Perioperative chemotherapy is the gold standard treatment in the resectable and advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. The efficacy of this strategy has been demonstrated in two randomized studies (1,2). It reduces tumour size before surgery, treats micrometastases and evaluates chemosensitivity. Disease free and overall survival rates were significantly improved with perioperative chemotherapy compared to surgery alone. However, the limitation of these studies is that among all patients requiring chemotherapy, almost 70% of patients will not have the complete sequence. This sequence is defined by the administration of 2 to 4 cycles before and 2 to 4 cycles after the surgery, according to the protocol. The major cause of absence or impossibility of realization of postoperative chemotherapy was the presence of postoperative complication, postoperative serious asthenia and impaired nutritional and physical status (1,2). Poor physical condition assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing, reflecting a reduced physiological reserve, is predictive of postoperative complications (3,4). A physical training, even during a short period and on a various population, is beneficial in improving physical condition, cardiopulmonary function and muscular mass of the patient (5-8). A prehabilitation over a 6 week period between surgical consultation and surgery decreases postoperative morbidity and the hospital stay in cardiovascular surgery but no study has ever been performed in the gastric or oesophageal cancer (7,9). Prehabilitation revolves around three axes: 1) a physical training based on initial cardiopulmonary exercise testing (VO2peak, anaerobic threshold (AT) and 6-min walk test (6MWT)), 3 times by week, supervised by a physical therapist 2) a nutritional care to ensure the compliance of the nutrition program and adapt the nutritional management based on protein and energy needs and on the level of spontaneous oral intake and 2) a psychological treatment by a psychologist to reduce preoperative anxiety. To our knowledge, no study ever focused on the gastroesophageal cancer. The benefit of prehabilitation in this cancer may be particularly important because 1) this surgery is associated with a high postoperative morbidity (40%, especially respiratory) and mortality (5%) 2) the physical and nutritional status of these patients is often precarious (cancer cachexia, gastroesophageal obstruction), and 3) the need to preoperative chemotherapy declines physical reserves and is associated with a lengthening of the time between consultation and surgery of more than 3 months (10). Also, the investigators hypothesize that with a physical training, a personalized nutritional support and a psychologist management may decrease postoperative complications, increase postoperative nutritional status and so, would allow for more patients to receive their full cancer treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate, in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, the effect of prehabilitation compared to conventional care, the percentage of patients reaching the complete oncological treatment decided in a multidisciplinary tumour board.
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gastric Cancer | Malignant Gastric Neoplasm | CURATED_BROADER | 0.80 |
| Oesophageal Cancer | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| nutritional support | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
| prehabilitation | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Prehab Group
- description
- In the experimental group (Prehab group) compared to the control group, the main objective will be to demonstrate an improvement of the percentage of patients reaching the complete oncological treatment fixed in a multidisciplinary tumour board
- interventionNames
- Procedure: prehabilitation
- type
- OTHER
- label
- control group
- description
- The control group will be treated according to conventional care; will not receive any specific intervention before surgery except nutritional support and physiotherapy at the surgeon's discretion
- interventionNames
- Other: nutritional support
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: \> 18 years old. * Patient who agreed to participate in the study * Patient requiring surgical management for the cancer of the esophagus or stomach. * Patient who have a standard perioperative chemotherapy: For esophageal cancer: chemotherapy with 5-FU (or LV5-FU2) -platinum salts or Taxane-salt platinum salts, 2 to 4 cycles pre- and postoperatively. For stomach cancer: Perioperative chemotherapy with Epirubicin and cisplatin-5-FU (ECF), Epirubicin-oxaliplatin-5FU (EOX) or 5-FU (or LV5FU) - platinum salts, 2 to 4 cycles. * subscribe to the French national health insurance system and give their written consent. * Patient speak and understand French. * effective contraception for patients of childbearing age Exclusion Criteria: * Patient who for psychiatric social, family or geographical reasons, will not be able to be monitored and/or compliant with the requirements of the study. * Patient requiring preoperative radio-chemotherapy. with any unbalanced progressive disease (hepatic failure, renal failure (creatinine clearance \<30mL / min), respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction in the last 6 months) * Patient treated for another cancer within 5 years, except basal cell skin carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of the cervix. * patient in legal incapacity (person deprived of liberty or under guardianship). * cognitive disorders or major disability making it impossible to understand the study and sign the informed consent * breastfeeding or pregnancy
References
Publications (1)
- DERIVEDLe Roy B, Pereira B, Bouteloup C, Costes F, Richard R, Selvy M, Petorin C, Gagniere J, Futier E, Slim K, Meunier B, Mabrut JY, Mariette C, Pezet D. Effect of prehabilitation in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma: study protocol of a multicentric, randomised, control trial-the PREHAB study. BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 7;6(12):e012876. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012876. PMID 27927660