Clinical trial · Interventional
Loop Ileostomy Closure:Stapled or Hand-sewn Anastomoses? Suture or Mesh Closure of the Stoma Site?
Loop Ileostomy Closure.Stapled or Hand-sewn Anastomoses? Suture or Mesh Closure of the Stoma Site in the Abdominal Wall. A Prospective Randomised Multicenter Trial.
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
There are severel problems associated with the closing of a temporary loop-ileostomy after surgery for rectal cancer. The purpose of this study is to answer two questions: 1. The choice of anastomotic method - does it influence the postoperative course? 2. The use of a prophylactic mesh when closing the stoma site - will there be less hernias?
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rectal Neoplasm | Rectal Neoplasm | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mesh or suture stoma site closure | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Stapled or Hand-sewn anastomosis | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (4)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Stapled anastomosis
- description
- Stapled anastomosis by the use of commercially available linear stapler device
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Stapled or Hand-sewn anastomosis
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Hand-sewn anastomosis
- description
- Hand-sewn by the use of a resorbable monofilament suture
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Stapled or Hand-sewn anastomosis
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Abdominal wall mesh closure
- description
- Closure by the use of a mesh low-weight net device
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * loop ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery * loop ileostomy closure is permitted and possible according to clinical practice Exclusion Criteria: * patient unable to understand written or oral information
References
Publications (6)
- BACKGROUNDGustavsson K, Gunnarsson U, Jestin P. Postoperative complications after closure of a diverting ileostoma--differences according to closure technique. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jan;27(1):55-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1287-4. Epub 2011 Aug 16. PMID 21845418
- BACKGROUNDGong J, Guo Z, Li Y, Gu L, Zhu W, Li J, Li N. Stapled vs hand suture closure of loop ileostomy: a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(10):e561-8. doi: 10.1111/codi.12388. PMID 24033921
- BACKGROUNDRubio-Perez I, Leon M, Pastor D, Diaz Dominguez J, Cantero R. Increased postoperative complications after protective ileostomy closure delay: An institutional study. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Sep 27;6(9):169-74. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v6.i9.169. PMID 25276286
- BACKGROUNDAkiyoshi T, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, Kuroyanagi H, Ueno M, Oya M, Yamaguchi T. Complications of loop ileostomy closure in patients with rectal tumor. World J Surg. 2010 Aug;34(8):1937-42. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0547-8. PMID 20372898
- BACKGROUNDChude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V, Koshariya M, Jagad R, Kawamoto J, Lygidakis NJ. Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Sep-Oct;55(86-87):1562-7. PMID 19102343
- BACKGROUNDLoffler T, Rossion I, Bruckner T, Diener MK, Koch M, von Frankenberg M, Pochhammer J, Thomusch O, Kijak T, Simon T, Mihaljevic AL, Kruger M, Stein E, Prechtl G, Hodina R, Michal W, Strunk R, Henkel K, Bunse J, Jaschke G, Politt D, Heistermann HP, Fusser M, Lange C, Stamm A, Vosschulte A, Holzer R, Partecke LI, Burdzik E, Hug HM, Luntz SP, Kieser M, Buchler MW, Weitz J; HASTA Trial Group. HAnd Suture Versus STApling for Closure of Loop Ileostomy (HASTA Trial): results of a multicenter randomized trial (DRKS00000040). Ann Surg. 2012 Nov;256(5):828-35; discussion 835-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318272df97.