Clinical trial · Interventional
Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS) After Liver Resection for Primary Liver Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS) After Liver Resection for Primary Liver Cancer: a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study
NCT02644603CI-TRIAL-00028280unknownN/AClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS) protocol versus conventional treatment on patients who underwent liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carcinoma, Hepatocellular | Hepatocellular Carcinoma | ONTOLOGY_EXACT | 0.98 |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Recovery After Surgery | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- description
- Patients underwent ERAS protocol
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- type
- NO_INTERVENTION
- label
- Conventional Treatment
- description
- Patients underwent conventional treatment
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Treatment related complications
- timeFrame
- Up to 1 month since operation
- description
- Number of adverse events that are related to treatment of each patients, and hospital readmission
Secondary outcomes (16)
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 70 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosed with HCC with indications for surgery * Without any surgical contraindications * Under went open liver resection * Operation ranges less than 4 hepatic segments * Informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Not suitable for surgery * Benign lesions or other lesions proved by pathology * Surgical procedure changed during operation or combined evisceration * Refused to participate or drop out
References
Publications (3)
- BACKGROUNDSun HC, Qin LX, Lu L, Wang L, Ye QH, Ren N, Fan J, Tang ZY. Randomized clinical trial of the effects of abdominal drainage after elective hepatectomy using the crushing clamp method. Br J Surg. 2006 Apr;93(4):422-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5260. PMID 16491462
- BACKGROUNDWilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ. 2001 Feb 24;322(7284):473-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.473. No abstract available. PMID 11222424
- BACKGROUNDNi CY, Yang Y, Chang YQ, Cai H, Xu B, Yang F, Lau WY, Wang ZH, Zhou WP. Fast-track surgery improves postoperative recovery in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for primary liver cancer: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;39(6):542-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Apr 4. PMID 23562361