Clinical trial · Interventional
Two-field Versus Three-field Lymphadenectomy in Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma Without Cervical Lymph Node Involvement
Comparison of Lymph Node Dissection Results and Prognosis in Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma Without Cervical Lymph Node Involvement: Two-field Versus Three-field Lymph Node Dissection
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The purpose of this study is to compare the lymph node dissection results and prognosis in thoracic esophageal carcinoma patients without cervical lymph node involvement by preoperative CT and/or ultrasound treated by two-field lymphadenectomy or three-field lymphadenectomy.Another purpose of this study is to clarify whether the lymph node along the right recurrent laryngeal nerve can be taken as the sentinel lymph node which is able to indicate neck lymph node metastasis and necessity for three-field lymphadenectomy.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esophageal Cancer | Malignant Esophageal Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Three-field lymphadenectomy | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Two-field lymphadenectomy | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- negative lymph node
- description
- lymph node along the right recurrent laryngeal nerve should be confirmed negative by intraoperative frozen pathology examination
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Two-field lymphadenectomy
- Procedure: Three-field lymphadenectomy
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- positive lymph node
- description
- lymph node along the right recurrent laryngeal nerve should be confirmed negative by intraoperative frozen pathology examination
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Three-field lymphadenectomy
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Long term survival
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 75 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with histologically confirmed squamous cell esophageal cancer, without any previous anti-tumor therapy; 2. Preoperative clinical TNM stage:cT1b-3N0-1M0; 3. Adequate cardiopulmonary, liver, brain and kidney functions for esophagectomy either via right thoracotomy or VATS; 4. No evidence of suspicious neck lymph node metastasis (LN short diameter \< 0.8cm or LN short/long diameter \<0.65 by cervical CT and/or ultrasound); 5. Willing to participate the clinical trial and sign the informed consent before being enrolled into clinical trail Exclusion Criteria: 1. Previous use of anti-cancer therapy; 2. Preoperative clinical TNM stage: N2-3 or M1; 3. Inadequate cardiopulmonary,liver, brain and kidney function for surgery; 4. Previous malignancy history. 5. Suspicious neck lymph node metastasis (LN short diameter ≧0.8cm or LN short/long diameter ≧0.65 by cervical CT and/or ultrasound); 6. Unwilling to participate the clinical trial and refuse to sign informed consent.
References
Publications (1)
- DERIVEDMao Y, Liu S, Han Y, Guo S, Chen C, Gao S, Hao A, Duan H, Fang W, Zhang R, Yu Z, Fu X, Li X, Wang Q, Tan L, Li Z, Li Y, Zhang Z, Wei W, Fang Y, Fu D, Wei X, Yuan L, Muhammad S, He J. Three-field vs two-field lymphadenectomy in thoracic ESCC patients: a multicenter randomized study (NST 1503). J Natl Cancer Cent. 2025 Jan 14;5(2):203-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2025.01.002. eCollection 2025 Apr. PMID 40265094