Clinical trial · Interventional
Comparison of Surgical,Clinical and Oncological Outcomes Between Robotic-assisted and Laparoscopic-assisted Gastrectomy
Compared With Robotic-assisted and Laparoscopic-assisted Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer on Surgical,Clinical and Oncological Outcomes
NCT02413476CI-TRIAL-00017941unknownPhase 2 / Phase 3ClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The study aims to compare the clinical outcomes between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer,and evaluate the the feasibility and safety of robotic gastrectomy. Furthermore, the investigators can explore the patients who are more suitable for robotic gastrectomy.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gastric Cancer | Malignant Gastric Neoplasm | CURATED_BROADER | 0.80 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laparoscopic-assisted Gastrectomy(LAG) | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Robotic-assisted Gastrectomy(RAG) | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Robotic-assisted Gastrectomy(RAG)
- description
- Robotic-assisted Gastrectomy will be performed for the treatment of patients assigned to this group.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Robotic-assisted Gastrectomy(RAG)
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Laparoscopic-assisted Gastrectomy(LAG)
- description
- Laparoscopic-assisted Gastrectomy will be performed for the treatment of patients assigned to this group.
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Laparoscopic-assisted Gastrectomy(LAG)
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Five-year disease free survival rate
- timeFrame
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 80 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Pathologically proven gastric cancer(early or advanced). 2. Age:older than 18 years old,younger than 80 years old. 3. cT1-4a(surgically resectable tumor),N0-3,M0 at preoperative evaluation according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual Seventh Edition 4. No obvious surgical contraindications. 5. American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score class I, II, or III 6. Written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Severe mental disorder 2. Pregnancy 3. History of previous upper abdominal surgery (except laparoscopic cholecystectomy) 4. History of previous gastrectomy,endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection. 5. History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within past six months 6. History of previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy 7. History of other malignant disease within past 5 years. 8. Enlarged or bulky regional lymph node diameter over 3cm by preoperative imaging 9. Any accompanying surgical condition needed to be performed in the same time
References
Publications (16)
- BACKGROUNDPark JY, Ryu KW, Reim D, Eom BW, Yoon HM, Rho JY, Choi IJ, Kim YW. Robot-assisted gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it beneficial in viscerally obese patients compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy? World J Surg. 2015 Jul;39(7):1789-97. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-2998-4. PMID 25670040
- BACKGROUNDParisi A, Desiderio J. Establishing a multi-institutional registry to compare the outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery for gastric cancer. Surgery. 2015 Apr;157(4):830-1. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 26. No abstract available. PMID 25633739
- BACKGROUNDLee J, Kim YM, Woo Y, Obama K, Noh SH, Hyung WJ. Robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer patients with high body mass index: comparison with conventional laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3251-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4069-1. Epub 2015 Jan 29. PMID 25631106
- BACKGROUNDChuan L, Yan S, Pei-Wu Y. Meta-analysis of the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015 Jun;24(3):127-34. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2014.985685. Epub 2014 Dec 3. PMID 25467019
- BACKGROUNDSuda K, Ishida Y, Uyama I. [Current status of robotic surgery for gastric cancer]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2014 Nov;41(11):1358-61. Japanese. PMID 25434438
- BACKGROUNDHuang KH, Lan YT, Fang WL, Chen JH, Lo SS, Li AF, Chiou SH, Wu CW, Shyr YM. Comparison of the operative outcomes and learning curves between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 31;9(10):e111499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111499. eCollection 2014. PMID 25360767
- BACKGROUNDZong L, Seto Y, Aikou S, Takahashi T. Efficacy evaluation of subtotal and total gastrectomies in robotic surgery for gastric cancer compared with that in open and laparoscopic resections: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 28;9(7):e103312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103312. eCollection 2014.