Clinical trial · Interventional
RFA RCT for Pancreatic or Bile Duct Cancer
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Radiofrequency Ablation and Stenting vs. Stenting Alone for Biliary Obstruction Due to Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma and Pancreatic Cancer
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Why stopped (as posted): Enrollment was feasibly not going to be reached.
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Malignant obstructive jaundice is a common complication of advanced stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Over 50% of common bile duct (CBD) obstructions are due to malignancy, and the majority of neoplasms are unresectable at the time of diagnosis. Biliary drainage with placement of self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) for palliation is the therapy of choice in this set of patients. Conventional stent placement provides palliation for a limited duration only and these subjects come back with obstructive jaundice. Due to age, comorbidities, malignant disease status, it is better to conduct reduced number of therapeutic endoscopies to reduce the number of complications. Additionally, only biliary stenting itself may provide only palliation, and not increase the duration of survival. Currently, there are only two therapies. Recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been evaluated as a palliative and potential neoadjuvant modality. Therefore if RFA confers similar benefits, then it may potentially be used as an alternative to PDT, given the lower adverse event profile. More recently, RFA has been recognized for its potential in palliative treatment of malignant biliary strictures. Based on the published data, RFA provides palliation and seems to increase survival duration in pancreatic cancer. Our own limited experience shows the same. The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to definitely confirm the benefit of Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in providing increased survival time and quality of life in patients with non-resectable cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. These benefits will improve clinical practice by making RFA the new standard of care for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and pancreatic cancer (PC). It will also enhance scientific knowledge by opening the door for new opportunities, e.g. RFA as a potential use for neoadjuvant therapy or as a downstaging agent for surgically resectable patients.
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cholangiocarcinoma Non-resectable | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer | Malignant Pancreatic Neoplasm | CURATED_BROADER | 0.78 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB Probe | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Stenting only | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Radiofrequency Ablation (EndoHbp probe)
- description
- Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB Probe
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Radiofrequency Ablation using EndoHPB Probe
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Stenting only
- description
- Stenting only
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Stenting only
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Clinical Success- composite
- timeFrame
- 1 year
- description
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: \- Either gender greater than or equal to 18 years of age. * Pancreatic cancer or cholangiocarcinoma unsuitable for surgical resection. Criteria of unresectability being based on 1) metastatic disease or 2) locally advanced. Subjects that are deemed to be unresectable will be determined by a surgeon or treating oncologist. * Biliary obstruction * Subjects capable of giving informed consent * Life expectancy of at least 6 months Exclusion Criteria: \- Exclusion Criteria * Cardiac Pacemaker * Patient unstable for ERCP or has failed ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ) * Inability to give informed consent * Uncorrected coagulopathy * Pregnant
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available