Clinical trial · Observational
18F-FDG PET Metabolic Phenotype in Evaluating Therapeutic Response for Breast Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases.
The Effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET Metabolic Phenotype in Evaluating Therapeutic Response for Breast Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases.
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
This study is to evaluate the effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET in following up of metastastic bone lesions and in predicting outcome for breast cancer patients after therapy. Primary outcome: Using 18F-FDG uptake to evaluate the metastatic bone status after treatment. The PET results will be compared with the results in Tc-99m MDP bone scintigraphy. Secondary outcome: Evaluate the relationship between the 18F-FDG uptake of the metastatic bone lesions and (1) breast cancer related tumor marker, (2) patients' survival.
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18F-FDG PET | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Breast Cancer | Malignant Breast Neoplasm | CURATED_EXACT | 0.92 |
Interventions
Interventions (0)
Data not yet available
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- label
- Histological proven breast cancer with bone lesion
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- The uptake of 18F-FDG PET.
- timeFrame
- 2 hours
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Female
- Minimum age
- 20 Years
- Maximum age
- 90 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age：20-90 years old 2. Histological proven breast cancer, with known metastatic bone lesion(s) 3. written informed consent signed Exclusion Criteria: 1. pregnant or intend to be pregnant 2. other malignancies known
References
Publications (13)
- BACKGROUNDSolomayer EF, Diel IJ, Meyberg GC, Gollan C, Bastert G. Metastatic breast cancer: clinical course, prognosis and therapy related to the first site of metastasis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000 Feb;59(3):271-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1006308619659. PMID 10832597
- BACKGROUNDRoberts CC, Daffner RH, Weissman BN, Bancroft L, Bennett DL, Blebea JS, Bruno MA, Fries IB, Germano IM, Holly L, Jacobson JA, Luchs JS, Morrison WB, Olson JJ, Payne WK, Resnik CS, Schweitzer ME, Seeger LL, Taljanovic M, Wise JN, Lutz ST. ACR appropriateness criteria on metastatic bone disease. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010 Jun;7(6):400-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.02.015. PMID 20522392
- BACKGROUNDHoussami N, Costelloe CM. Imaging bone metastases in breast cancer: evidence on comparative test accuracy. Ann Oncol. 2012 Apr;23(4):834-43. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr397. Epub 2011 Sep 6. PMID 21896542
- BACKGROUNDVassiliou V, Andreopoulos D, Frangos S, Tselis N, Giannopoulou E, Lutz S. Bone metastases: assessment of therapeutic response through radiological and nuclear medicine imaging modalities. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2011 Nov;23(9):632-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.03.010. Epub 2011 Apr 29. PMID 21530193
- BACKGROUNDGalasko CS. Diagnosis of skeletal metastases and assessment of response to treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Mar;(312):64-75. PMID 7634619
- BACKGROUNDCook GJ, Fogelman I. The role of nuclear medicine in monitoring treatment in skeletal malignancy. Semin Nucl Med. 2001 Jul;31(3):206-11. doi: 10.1053/snuc.2001.23527. PMID 11430527
- BACKGROUNDVogel CL, Schoenfelder J, Shemano I, Hayes DF, Gams RA. Worsening bone scan in the evaluation of antitumor response during hormonal therapy of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1995 May;13(5):1123-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.5.1123.