Clinical trial · Interventional
TruFreeze™ Airway Obstruction: TAO STUDY
A PROSPECTIVE, MULTI-CENTER PILOT STUDY OF THE truFREEZE™ SYSTEM TO ASSESS THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CRYO SPRAY ABLATION IN THE TREATMENT OF AIRWAY OBSTRUCTIONS (TruFreeze AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION - "TAO" STUDY)
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Why stopped (as posted): Withdrawn for business reasons
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The purpose of this study is to prospectively assess the efficacy and safety of spray cryotherapy ablation with the truFreeze System in conjunction with mechanical dilation or debridement for the treatment of clinically significant obstructions of the central airways. The primary effectiveness endpoint is the proportion of subjects with a minimum of 25% improvement in luminal patency following SCT treatment and mechanical intervention 30 days (+/- 5 days) following treatment. Additionally, a primary clinical safety endpoint is the reporting of all adverse events.
Conditions
Conditions (4)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Airway Obstruction | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Airway; Obstruction, With Emphysema | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Lung Disease Airways | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Lung Diseases, Obstructive | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (1)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| spray cryotherapy | Device | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (1)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- spray cryotherapy
- description
- spray cryotherapy: 4 -5 second sprays at Baseline (possible additional tx. to be determined at follow up)
- interventionNames
- Device: spray cryotherapy
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- The primary clinical effectiveness endpoint is a minimum of 25% improvement in luminal patency following SCT treatment and mechanical intervention, on the Day 30 assessment following the last SCT treatment.
- timeFrame
- 30 - 44 Days (+/- 5 days)
- description
- The primary efficacy endpoint for statistical analysis and study powering is the proportion of subjects exhibiting an adequate (minimum of 25%) improvement in airway patency on the Day 30 assessment following the last SCT treatment.
Secondary outcomes (1)
- measure
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Subjects with symptomatic, clinically significant central airway obstruction requiring treatment intervention and who are not candidates for surgical resection. The central airway obstruction must be a consequence of any of the following: 1. Benign airway strictures 2. Primary or secondary endobronchial tumors located in the central airways 3. Airway stents complicated by significant granulation tissue 2. Subjects (or designated proxies) who are able to provide written informed consent 3. Subjects aged 18 years or greater 4. Subjects with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 3 or less 5. Subjects deemed eligible candidates for spray cryotherapy based on medical history and physical exam Exclusion Criteria: 1. Subjects undergoing treatment with any other investigational therapy within the month preceding cryotherapy or planned within 1 month following treatment a. Subjects with malignant strictures who require chemotherapy/radiation therapy (including investigational therapies) within 30 days will be allowed participation in the study. 2. Subjects with extraluminal causes of airway obstruction such as bulky mediastinal adenopathy, or a central mediastinal tumor causing compression of the airway 3. Subjects with less than 3 month expected survival 4. Subjects who it is anticipated will require stent placement during their initial treatment 5. Subjects who are pregnant or nursing, per device instructions for use 6. Subjects (or a designated proxy) who are unwilling to provide written informed consent 7. Subjects with ECOG performance status greater than 3 8. Subjects likely to have difficulty complying with study visit follow-up scheduling 9. Known history of unresolved drug or alcohol dependency that would limit ability to comprehend or follow instructions related to informed consent, post-treatment instructions, or follow-up 10. Subjects with uncontrolled coagulopathy or other bleeding disorders
References
Publications (12)
- BACKGROUNDErnst A, Feller-Kopman D, Becker HD, Mehta AC. Central airway obstruction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Jun 15;169(12):1278-97. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200210-1181SO. PMID 15187010
- BACKGROUNDJohnston CM, Schoenfeld LP, Mysore JV, Dubois A. Endoscopic spray cryotherapy: a new technique for mucosal ablation in the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Jul;50(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70352-4. PMID 10385730
- BACKGROUNDGreenwald BD, Dumot JA, Horwhat JD, Lightdale CJ, Abrams JA. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of endoscopic low-pressure liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy in the esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2010 Jan;23(1):13-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00991.x. Epub 2009 Jun 9. PMID 19515183
- BACKGROUNDShaheen NJ, Greenwald BD, Peery AF, Dumot JA, Nishioka NS, Wolfsen HC, Burdick JS, Abrams JA, Wang KK, Mallat D, Johnston MH, Zfass AM, Smith JO, Barthel JS, Lightdale CJ. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic spray cryotherapy for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):680-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.018. PMID 20363409
- BACKGROUNDGreenwald BD, Dumot JA, Abrams JA, Lightdale CJ, David DS, Nishioka NS, Yachimski P, Johnston MH, Shaheen NJ, Zfass AM, Smith JO, Gill KR, Burdick JS, Mallat D, Wolfsen HC. Endoscopic spray cryotherapy for esophageal cancer: safety and efficacy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):686-93. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.042. PMID 20363410
- BACKGROUNDXue HB, Tan HH, Liu WZ, Chen XY, Feng N, Gao YJ, Song Y, Zhao YJ, Ge ZZ. A pilot study of endoscopic spray cryotherapy by pressurized carbon dioxide gas for Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopy. 2011 May;43(5):379-85. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256334. Epub 2011 Mar 24. PMID 21437849
- BACKGROUNDHalsey KD, Chang JW, Waldt A, Greenwald BD. Recurrent disease following endoscopic ablation of Barrett's high-grade dysplasia with spray cryotherapy. Endoscopy. 2011 Oct;43(10):844-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256649. Epub 2011 Aug 8.