Clinical trial · Interventional
FOcal RECurrent Assessment and Salvage Treatment
An Evaluation of a Novel Imaging Based Complex Diagnostic and Therapeutic Pathway Intervention for Men Who Fail Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Radiotherapy is the commonest form of prostate cancer treatment in the UK. In one in four men, radiotherapy will fail to control the cancer. These men are offered hormonal treatment which has significant side effects. Few men are offered a further treatment such as surgery, HIFU or cryotherapy. Only half of these men are cancer free at 5 years. The investigators believe this is due to poor imaging tests such as CT and Bone scan that cannot accurately detect whether cancer has come back inside or outside of the prostate or both. Also radiotherapy damages tissue surrounding the prostate which affects tissue healing for example after surgery. Treating just the cancer in the prostate only (focal treatment) rather than the whole prostate may limit this damage and cause fewer side-effects. The investigators want to see if new imaging tests can better identify cancer that has spread outside of the prostate and areas of cancer inside the prostate. Our new tests are whole-body MRI (for distant disease) and MRI guided biopsies (MRI-TB) (for local disease). First, the investigators will compare the results of whole-body MRI to existing imaging tests (bone-scan, and choline PET/CT) that try to find distant spread. Second, the investigators will compare the results of MRI-TB to a very detailed and accurate biopsy of the prostate called template prostate mapping which will show us where and how aggressive the cancer is. Third, if the cancer is confined to the prostate, the investigators will treat men using focal salvage therapies HIFU and cryotherapy. The investigators believe that these new imaging tests could better identify those who will benefit from early hormone treatment and those who will benefit from local salvage treatment. Our study may help justify carrying out a larger trial looking at how good the treatment is in controlling cancer in the medium and long-term.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progression of Prostate Cancer | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (3)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Salvage Therapy | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| MRI Targeted biopsies | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Whole Body MRI | Device | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (3)
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Whole body MRI
- description
- Comparing the detection rate of metastases of whole body MRI compared to current standard of care tests - Choline PET and Bone scan.
- interventionNames
- Device: Whole Body MRI
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- MRI Targeted Biopsies
- description
- Transperineal MRI-targeted biopsies and whole-gland transperineal prostate mapping biopsies
- interventionNames
- Procedure: MRI Targeted biopsies
- type
- EXPERIMENTAL
- label
- Focal Salvage Therapy
- description
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Male
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Previous external beam radiotherapy with or without neo-adjuvant/adjuvant hormone therapy 2. Biochemical failure as defined by the Phoenix criteria (PSA nadir + 2ng/ml) 3. Men considering local salvage treatment for radio-recurrent disease 4. Life expectancy of 5 years or more Exclusion Criteria: 1. Have taken any form of hormones (except 5-alpha reductase inhibitors) within the previous 6 months 2. Unable to have MRI scan as defined by standard care practice 3. Metallic implant likely to cause artefact and reduce scan quality 4. PSA doubling time of 3 months or less 5. PSA value 20ng/ml or greater 6. Prior prostate biopsies following biochemical failure 7. Any prior local intervention to the prostate (e.g., laser/electrical resection or incision, cryotherapy, HIFU, any other ablative modality, any other radiotherapy, any other prostate injection therapy for symptoms or cancer control) 8. Unable to have general or regional anaesthesia 9. Unable to give informed consent
References
Publications (3)
- DERIVEDLight A, Kanthabalan A, Otieno M, Pavlou M, Omar R, Adeleke S, Giganti F, Brew-Graves C, Williams NR, Emara A, Haroon A, Latifoltojar A, Sidhu H, Freeman A, Orczyk C, Nikapota A, Dudderidge T, Hindley RG, Virdi J, Arya M, Payne H, Mitra AV, Bomanji J, Winkler M, Horan G, Moore CM, Emberton M, Punwani S, Ahmed HU, Shah TT. The Role of Multiparametric MRI and MRI-targeted Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: An Analysis from the FORECAST Trial. Eur Urol. 2024 Jan;85(1):35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 29. PMID 37778954
- DERIVEDLight A, Peters M, Reddy D, Kanthabalan A, Otieno M, Pavlou M, Omar R, Adeleke S, Giganti F, Brew-Graves C, Williams NR, Emara A, Haroon A, Latifoltojar A, Sidhu H, Freeman A, Orczyk C, Nikapota A, Dudderidge T, Hindley RG, Virdi J, Arya M, Payne H, Mitra AV, Bomanji J, Winkler M, Horan G, Moore C, Emberton M, Punwani S, Ahmed HU, Shah TT. External validation of a risk model predicting failure of salvage focal ablation for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2023 Nov;132(5):520-530. doi: 10.1111/bju.16102. Epub 2023 Jun 29. PMID 37385981
- DERIVEDShah TT, Kanthabalan A, Otieno M, Pavlou M, Omar R, Adeleke S, Giganti F, Brew-Graves C, Williams NR, Grierson J, Miah H, Emara A, Haroon A, Latifoltojar A, Sidhu H, Clemente J, Freeman A, Orczyk C, Nikapota A, Dudderidge T, Hindley RG, Virdi J, Arya M, Payne H, Mitra A, Bomanji J, Winkler M, Horan G, Moore CM, Emberton M, Punwani S, Ahmed HU. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsies Compared to Transperineal Mapping Biopsies Before Focal Ablation in Localised and Metastatic Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radiotherapy. Eur Urol. 2022 Jun;81(6):598-605. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.022. Epub 2022 Mar 31. PMID 35370021