Clinical trial · Interventional
Laparoscopic Uterine Sparing Techniques Outcomes and Reinterventions
The LUSTOR (Laparoscopic Uterine Sparing Techniques Outcomes and Reinterventions)Trial
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of two uterine-conserving treatment alternatives for symptomatic uterine fibroids: laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) and global fibroid ablation (GFA) using the Halt System. Laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) is a standard step prior to the GFA procedure but has not been a standard step prior to LM. Incorporating laparoscopic ultrasound as a first step prior to both treatments allows the surgeon to have equal access to valuable imaging information and to plan treatment accordingly. By randomizing the subject immediately after laparoscopic ultrasound, selection bias toward one treatment or the other following the LUS is eliminated.
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myomas | Myoma | ALIAS | 0.90 |
| Uterine Fibroids | Uterine Corpus Leiomyoma | ALIAS | 0.90 |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Fibroid Ablation | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| Myomectomy | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- OTHER
- label
- Global Fibroid Ablation
- description
- Global Fibroid Ablation
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Global Fibroid Ablation
- type
- OTHER
- label
- Laparoscopic Myomectomy
- description
- Myomectomy via laparoscopy
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Myomectomy
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Compare the mean time of hospitalization following laparoscopic treatment of fibroids by myomectomy or GFA
- timeFrame
- From admission to the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 days
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- Female
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
- Maximum age
- 55 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Are ≥ 18 years old and menstruating * Have symptomatic uterine fibroids * Have a uterine size ≤16 gestational weeks as determined by pelvic exam * Have fibroids that are less than 10 cm in any diameter * Desire uterine conservation * Have had a normal Papanicolaou test (PAP smear) (i.e. PAP I or PAP II) at the latest pre-study examination and no longer than 36 months before study entry. * Are willing and able to comply with all study tests, procedures, and assessment tools * Are capable of providing informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Have contraindications for laparoscopic surgery and/or general anesthesia. * Are expected to be high risk for, or are known to have, significant intra-abdominal adhesions (defined as adhesions that would require extensive dissection to mobilize and view all surfaces of the uterus) * Patients requiring major elective concomitant procedures (e.g., hernia repair, hysteroscopic resection, endometrial ablation, uterine artery ligation, etc.) that could confound the results of the study * Are pregnant or lactating * Have taken any depot Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRh agonist within three months prior to the screening procedures * Have an implanted intrauterine or fallopian tube device for contraception that cannot or will not be removed at least ten days prior to treatment * Have chronic pelvic pain not due to uterine fibroids * Have known or suspected endometriosis or adenomyosis * Have active or history of pelvic inflammatory disease * Have a history of, or evidence of, gynecologic malignancy or pre-malignancy within the past five years * Have had pelvic radiation * Have a non-uterine pelvic mass over 3 cm * Have a cervical myoma * Have one or more completely intracavitary submucous fibroids (Type 0) or only Type 0/1 submucous fibroids that are better treated via hysteroscopic methods * In the medical judgment of the investigator should not participate in the study * Are not willing to be randomized to treatment.
References
Publications (23)
- BACKGROUNDSpies JB, Coyne K, Guaou Guaou N, Boyle D, Skyrnarz-Murphy K, Gonzalves SM. The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):290-300. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01702-1. PMID 11814511
- BACKGROUNDTwijnstra AR, Kolkman W, Trimbos-Kemper GC, Jansen FW. Implementation of advanced laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: national overview of trends. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):487-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.010. Epub 2010 May 14. PMID 20471917
- BACKGROUNDViswanathan M, Hartmann K, McKoy N, Stuart G, Rankins N, Thieda P, Lux LJ, Lohr KN. Management of uterine fibroids: an update of the evidence. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Jul;(154):1-122. PMID 18288885
- BACKGROUNDHolzer A, Jirecek ST, Illievich UM, Huber J, Wenzl RJ. Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy: a double-blind study to evaluate postoperative pain. Anesth Analg. 2006 May;102(5):1480-4. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000204321.85599.0d. PMID 16632830
- BACKGROUNDParker WH, Iacampo K, Long T. Uterine rupture after laparoscopic removal of a pedunculated myoma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 May-Jun;14(3):362-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.10.024. PMID 17478371
- BACKGROUNDBanas T, Klimek M, Fugiel A, Skotniczny K. Spontaneous uterine rupture at 35 weeks' gestation, 3 years after laparoscopic myomectomy, without signs of fetal distress. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2005 Dec;31(6):527-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2005.00331.x. PMID 16343253
- BACKGROUNDMara M, Maskova J, Fucikova Z, Kuzel D, Belsan T, Sosna O. Midterm clinical and first reproductive results of a randomized controlled trial comparing uterine fibroid embolization and myomectomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008 Jan-Feb;31(1):73-85. doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9195-2. Epub 2007 Oct 18.