Clinical trial · Observational
Quality of Life in Barrett's Esophagus and Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease
Quality of Life in Barrett's Esophagus and GERD:GERD Symptoms, Perception of Cancer Risk, and Actual Cancer Risk
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Why stopped (as posted): Lack of recruitment
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
To Compare the overall quality of life of patients with no Barrett's esophagus , non-dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus (NDBE), Barrett's esophagus with low grade dysplasia (LGD), and Barrett's esophagus with high grade dysplasia (HGD). We also Compare the overall quality of life of Barrett's esophagus patients with severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms to those with no GERD symptoms
Conditions
Conditions (2)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barrett's Esophagus | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
| Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (0)
Data not yet available
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (4)
- label
- No Barrett's esophagus
- description
- Subject without columnar lined esophagus
- label
- Nondysplastic BE
- description
- Subject with columnar lined esophagus and absence of dysplasia
- label
- Low grade dysplastic BE
- description
- subject with columnar lined esophagus and presence of low grade dysplasia
- label
- High grade dysplastic BE
- description
- subject with columnar lined esophagus and presence of high grade dysplasia
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Health State Utility as measured by the Time Trade-off (TTO) method/Standard Gamble (SG) method
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Minimum age
- 18 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 or above At least one of the following: Previous diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus Presence of GERD symptoms per patient report Exclusion Criteria: None
References
Publications (7)
- BACKGROUNDGerson LB, Ullah N, Hastie T, Triadafilopoulos G, Goldstein M. Patient-derived health state utilities for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Mar;100(3):524-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40588.x. PMID 15743346
- BACKGROUNDCrockett SD, Lippmann QK, Dellon ES, Shaheen NJ. Health-related quality of life in patients with Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jun;7(6):613-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.02.024. Epub 2009 Mar 10. PMID 19281858
- BACKGROUNDEloubeidi MA, Provenzale D. Health-related quality of life and severity of symptoms in patients with Barrett's esophagus and gastroesophageal reflux disease patients without Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Aug;95(8):1881-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02235.x. PMID 10950030
- BACKGROUNDShaheen NJ, Green B, Medapalli RK, Mitchell KL, Wei JT, Schmitz SM, West LM, Brown A, Noble M, Sultan S, Provenzale D. The perception of cancer risk in patients with prevalent Barrett's esophagus enrolled in an endoscopic surveillance program. Gastroenterology. 2005 Aug;129(2):429-36. doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.055. PMID 16083700
- BACKGROUNDKruijshaar ME, Siersema PD, Janssens AC, Kerkhof M, Steyerberg EW, Essink-Bot ML; CYBAR Study Group. Patients with Barrett's esophagus perceive their risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma as low. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Jan;65(1):26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.05.030. PMID 17185076
- BACKGROUNDWare JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83. PMID 1593914
- BACKGROUNDKulig M, Leodolter A, Vieth M, Schulte E, Jaspersen D, Labenz J, Lind T, Meyer-Sabellek W, Malfertheiner P, Stolte M, Willich SN. Quality of life in relation to symptoms in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-- an analysis based on the ProGERD initiative. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Oct 15;18(8):767-76. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01770.x.