Evaluating the Effect of a Decision Aid on Shared Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening

Decision-aids are tools to educate patients on a given topic so that they may better participate in shared-decision making in their health care. Given the complexities associated with PSA testing, many professional organizations have advocated for shared-decision making for PSA testing. However, no consensus exists as to how best educate and involve patients in the shared-decision making process. The goal of this study is to evaluate a pilot program utilizing a simple PSA screening decision-aid presented in two different fashions in a primary care clinic with a large fraction of African-American patients. The investigators will evaluate the effectiveness of this program to educate patients on the risks and benefits of prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing, on their subsequent level of comfort with their decision about whether to receive PSA testing, and on the comfort level of physicians on their patient's decisions regarding PSA testing, and importantly, how well these strategies can be implemented into the daily work-flow of a clinic. If successful, this program may serve as a model for the broader implementation of such strategies across Minnesota and the country.

Sex

Male

Minimum age

50 Years

Maximum age

75 Years

Inclusion criteria:

* Males ages 50-75
* Able to read and speak English
* Provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria:

* Diagnosis of prostate cancer
* PSA testing within last 12 months
* Previous prostate biopsy
* Voiding problems as reason for clinic visit
* Visit scheduled same day or 'walk-In' patient