Clinical trial · Interventional
Fast Track Rehabilitation Following Video-assisted Lung Segmentectomy
NCT01397045CI-TRIAL-00014124completedN/AClinicalTrials.gov clinicaltrialsProvenance
- Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- Retrieved
- Sep 8, 2026
- Layer
- normalized (units and labels harmonized; values unchanged)
- Run
- ING-CLINICALTRIALS-20260908-000001
Summary
Brief summary (as posted)
Aim of this prospective randomized study is to assess the safety and efficacy of video-assisted lung segmentectomy (Group B) comparing with mini muscle-sparing thoracotomy (group A) during diagnostic process for pulmonary nodules.
Conditions
Conditions (1)
Free-text conditions as registered, with the CancerIndex entity they were reconciled to and the match type.
| Condition (as posted) | Mapped entity | Match | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multiple Pulmonary Nodules | — | UNRESOLVED | — |
Interventions
Interventions (2)
| Intervention | Type | Mapped drug | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mini thoracotomy | Procedure | — | UNRESOLVED |
| VATS | Other | — | UNRESOLVED |
Design
Arms and outcomes
Arms (2)
- type
- ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
- label
- Video-assisted lung segmentectomy
- description
- Patients undergoing VATS segmentectomy
- interventionNames
- Other: VATS
- type
- OTHER
- label
- Mini thoracotomy
- description
- Patients undergoing lung segmentectomy through a mini thoracotomy
- interventionNames
- Procedure: Mini thoracotomy
Primary outcomes (1)
- measure
- Duration of hospital stay
- timeFrame
- Participants will be followed till home discharge, an average of 2 weeks
Eligibility
Eligibility (as posted)
- Sex
- All
- Maximum age
- 80 Years
Show eligibility criteria text
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with undiagnosed multiple pulmonary nodules Exclusion Criteria: * Centrally located lesions * previous thoracotomy * extensive lung consolidation, and inability to achieve one lung ventilation
References
Publications (0)
Data not yet available
No reference posted for this study.